Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Apr 8;39(5):1377–1392. doi: 10.1037/a0032328

Table 1.

Fit statistics for the source memory data

	Fit Statistic
Model	G² (df)	AIC	BIC
	Experiment 1 – Unbalanced
Dual Process	34.90 (4)	184.87	279.87
Continuous UV	10.92 (7)	154.89	232.08
Continuous EV	115.22 (8)	257.19	328.44
	Experiment 1 – Balanced
Dual Process	48.91 (8)	192.35	263.60
Continuous UV	30.35 (11)	167.79	221.23
Continuous EV	146.67 (12)	282.11	329.61
	Experiment 2a (Balanced)
Dual Process	49.40 (8)	208.32	288.23
Continuous UV	32.91 (11)	185.83	245.76
Continuous EV	170.56 (12)	321.48	374.75
	Experiment 2b (Balanced)
Dual Process	71.59 (8)	232.35	313.82
Continuous UV	45.49 (11)	200.25	261.35
Continuous EV	224.63 (12)	377.39	431.70

Note: UV – unequal variance; EV – equal variance