Table 1.
Comparison of compliance using power exponential, computer-based linear interpolation and manual linear interpolation models
Exponential model Baseline | Post-Rx | Computer interpolation Baseline | Post-Rx | Manual interpolation Baseline | Post-Rx | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pr10* | 8.0 and 12.6 [10.2 (1.9)] | 6.1 and 12.3 [8.9 (2.4)] | 4.9 and 9.2 [6.5 (1.3)] | 4.3 and 8.0 [5.9 (1.4)] | 4.9 and 7.9 [6.1 (1.4)] | 1.3 and 8.0 [5.3 (2.3)] |
Pr50* | 15.0 and 22.1 [18.5 (3.1)] | 11.4 and 20.4 [16.2 (3.5)] | 15.0 and 25.4 [20.6 (4.3)] | 11.7 and 23.1 [18.0 (4.4)] | 15.3 and 25.3 [20.3 (4.0)] | 11.7 and 22.2 [17.6 (4.3)] |
Pr90* | 35.2 and 57.0 [47.7 (10.9)] | 27.7 and 50.9 [42.0 (9.3)] | 27.9 and 41.8 [37.3 (5.7)] | 25.0 and 39.7 [34.8 (5.9)] | 27.3 and 41.3 [36.9 (5.8)] | 23.7 and 39.4 [34.1 (5.9)] |
Females [n = 23; mean (SD)] | ||||||
Pr10 | 9.6 (1.7) | 8.2 (2.3) | 6.2 (1.4) | 5.5 (1.4) | 6.0 (1.4) | 4.7 (2.5) |
Pr50 | 17.7 (3.2) | 15.4 (3.9) | 19.6 (4.4) | 17.1 (5.1) | 19.2 (4.2) | 16.8 (5.0) |
Pr90 | 46.9 (12.9) | 41.8 (10.9) | 36.7 (6.4) | 34.3 (6.8) | 36.3 (6.5) | 33.5 (6.9) |
Males [n = 17; mean (SD)] | ||||||
Pr10 | 10.9 (2.0) | 9.8 (1.9) | 7.1 (1.0) | 6.4 (1.3) | 6.2 (1.3) | 6.0 (2.0) |
Pr50 | 19.5 (2.8) | 17.3 (2.6) | 21.9 (3.8) | 19.1 (3.0) | 21.8 (3.4) | 18.8 (2.7) |
Pr90 | 48.9 (7.7) | 42.2 (6.8) | 38.1 (4.7) | 35.4 (4.6) | 37.7 (4.7) | 34.9 (4.9) |
Values are expressed as 10th and 90th percentiles [mean (SD)] in each cell.