Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007 Oct 25;20(4):330–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01024.x

Table 2.

Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) comparing power exponential, computer-based linear interpolation and manual linear interpolation models

Power exponential model Computer-based linear interpolation Manual linear interpolation
Pr10
 Power exponential model – Post-Rx – 0.297 (0.159–0.424) Post-Rx – 0.251 (0.107–0.384)
 Computer-based linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.178 (0.080–0.274) – Post-Rx – 0.583 (0.349–0.749)
 Manual linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.108 (0.024–0.191) Pre-Rx – 0.707 (0.522–0.828) –
Pr50
 Power exponential model – Post-Rx – 0.866 (0.783–0.918) Post-Rx – 0.892 (0.820–0.937)
 Computer-based linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.808 (0.702–0.879) – Post-Rx – 0.989 (0.980, 0.994)
 Manual linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.835 (0.741–0.898) Pre-Rx – 0.983 (0.968–0.994) –
Pr90
 Power exponential model – Post-Rx – 0.579 (0.416–0.707) Post-Rx – 0.527 (0.361–0.660)
 Computer-based linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.405 (0.236–0.550) – Post-Rx – 0.978 (0.960–0.988)
 Manual linear interpolation Pre-Rx – 0.391 (0.225–0.535) Pre-Rx – 0.991 (0.984–0.995) –

Values are expressed as CCC (95% confidence interval).