Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 20;28(2):225–238. doi: 10.1210/me.2013-1319

Table 1.

Summary of Transgenic Lines

Phenotype/Name Global Knockouts
GnRH-Specific Knockouts
GPR54tm1SPR GPR54tm1PTL GPR54tm1HPC GnRH-Cre+/−-GPR54f/f GKirKO
Strategy (deletion) Part of exon 2 Part of exon 1 and 2 Exon 2 Exon 2 Exon 2
Vaginal opening, d NR 100 37 No pubertal onset 36
Preputial separation, % NR NR None None 20
Estrous cycling NR No NR No No
LH (F) ng/mL (vs WT) NR 0.38 ± 0.12 (↔) 0.4 ± 0.2 (↔) AVNR (↔) 0.33 ± 0.08 (↓)
LH (M) ng/mL (vs WT) NR 0.18 ± 0.10 (↔) 0.1 ± 0.0 (↓) 0.13 ± 0.03 (↔) 0.28 ± 0.07 (↓)
FSH (F) ng/mL (vs WT) NR 6.8 ± 1.8 (↓) 3.3 ± 0.6 (↓) AVNR (↓) 0.32 ± 0.10 (↓)
FSH (M) ng/mL (vs WT) NR 2.0 ± 0.7 (↓) 1.5 ± 0.2 (↓) 0.25 ± 0.01 (↓) 0.12 ± 0.02 (↓)
Ovary (vs WT), % Smaller 18 41 (hemiblock) 10 30
Uterus (vs WT) Smaller Smaller NR Threadlike Smaller
Penis development Microphallus Microphallus Microphallus NR Microphallus
Testes (weight vs WT), % 10 28 17 10
Reference Funes et al, 2003 (3) Seminara et al, 2003 (4) Lapatto et al, 2007 (10) Kirilov et al, 2013 (41) Novaira et al (this study)

Abbreviations: AVNR, absolute value not reported; F, female; GKirKO, GnRH kisspeptin receptor knockout; HPC, Harvard Partners Center; M, male; NR, not reported; PTL, Paradigm Therapeutics; SPR, Schering Plough Research; tm, targeted mutation; (↔), unchanged; (↓), decreased. The inherent variability of LH and FSH assays makes direct comparisons challenging.