Skip to main content
NCBI home page
BMC Veterinary Research logoLink to BMC Veterinary Research
. 2014 Jan 17;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-26

Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in dogs in Henan Province, China

Fuchun Jian 1,2, Meng Qi 1,2, Xiaoyi He 3, Rongjun Wang 1,2, Sumei Zhang 1,2, Heping Dong 1, Longxian Zhang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC3896686  PMID: 24433398

Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidiosis in dogs has been reported worldwide, involving both asymptomatic and diarrheic dogs. Large-scale surveys of Cryptosporidium infection in dogs have been performed in some countries using differents diagnostic methods. But, few data are available on the infection rate and molecular characteristics of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs in China.

Result

In this study, 770 fecal samples from 66 locations in Henan Province were examined. The average Cryptosporidium infection rate was 3.8%, with dogs in kennels having the highest rate of 7.0% (χ2 = 14.82, P < 0.01). The infection rate was 8.0% in dogs younger than 90 days, which was significantly higher than that in the other age groups (1.1–3.8%;χ2 = 18.82, P < 0.01). No association was noted between the infection rate and the sex of the dogs. Twenty-nine Cryptosporidium-positive samples were amplified at the small subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA), 70-kDa heat shock protein (HSP70), and actin loci using PCR. Sequence analysis of these amplicons identified only Cryptosporidium canis, which showed 100% identity with the published sequences of the SSU rRNA, HSP70, and actin genes.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that C. canis is popular in the dog population in China, considering the large number of dogs in China and the close contact between dogs and humans, the role of C. canis in the transmission of human cryptosporidiosis warrants attention.

Keywords: Infection rate, Dogs, Cryptosporidium canis, SSU rRNA, HSP70, Actin

Background

Cryptosporidium spp. are important zoonotic protozoan parasites that infect more than 280 species of vertebrate animals and can cause acute or chronic diarrhea and even death [1]. So far, at least 26 valid Cryptosporidium species have been named, and more than 73 host-adapted genotypes of undetermined species status have been described [1,2].

Dogs are often considered to be faithful friends and intimate companions of humans. However, dogs and cats also act as reservoirs for a large number of pathogens of parasitic zoonoses, including cryptosporidiosis. Cryptosporidium canis, the most frequently identified species of Cryptosporidium in dogs, has been found in stray and domesticated dogs worldwide [3-10], although small numbers of zoonotic C. parvum, C. muris, and C. meleagridis have also been detected in dogs [7,11-16]. Cryptosporidium canis is considered a potentially zoonotic Cryptosporidium species based on its presence in human patients in the United Kingdom, Jamaica, Kenya, Peru, Thailand, and the United States [1,17,18].

In China, the history of raising dogs goes back more than 6000 years [19]. The total number of dogs in China at present is vast, with the number of pet dogs alone approaching 200 million [20]. This large number of dogs may be a serious threat to public health because of the widespread occurrence of rabies and other zoonotic diseases, including cryptosporidiosis. Unfortunately, only a few studies of cryptosporidiosis in dogs in China have been reported, all of which were published in the Chinese language and none of which included genotype analyses [21-23]. Therefore, in this study, we used molecular methods to identify the Cryptosporidium species present in a relatively extensive survey of dogs and evaluated the risk of zoonotic infections.

Results and discussion

The overall infection rate with Cryptosporidium was 3.8% (29/770). This is similar to the rates in studies conducted in the United States (2.0 and 3.8%) and Italy (3.3%), and one survey in China (2.59%) [6,28,29], whereas the infection rate was slightly lower than those reported in Japan (3.9%), Iran (5%), and Canada (9.3%) [9,10,14]. No clinical signs were apparent in any of the Cryptosporidium-positive dogs at the time of specimen collection. The infection rates of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs in kennels, pet shops, pet hospitals, and the police canine center were 7.0% (16/229; 95% CI: 7.0 ± 0.23%), 4.5% (11/246; 95% CI: 4.5 ± 0.17%), 1.0% (2/206; 95% CI: 1.0 ± 0.09%), and 0 (0/89), respectively (Table 1). These differences might be partly attributable to the various feeding and management practices used and to hygienic conditions. For example, in the police canine center, each dog was kept in a single shed and the feces excreted by the dogs were cleared in a timely manner by the dogs’ handlers, whereas the dogs in kennels were kept together, which increased the chance of cross-transmission among them.

Table 1.

Number of fecal samples from different sampling locations examined for Cryptosporidium oocysts with microscopy

Collection site No. samples No. positive Prevalence (95% CI) (%)
Kennel
 229
 16
 7.0 ± 0.23
Pet shop
 246
 11
 4.5 ± 0.17
Pet hospital
 206
 2
 1.0 ± 0.09
Police canine center
 89
 0
 0
Total 770 29 3.8 ± 0.05
Open in a new tab

The Cryptosporidium infection rates differed with age. The highest infection rate was 8.0% (95% CI: 8.0 ± 0.06%) and was found among dogs aged < 90 days and the lowest rate of 1.1% (95% CI: 1.1 ± 0.08%) was found among dogs aged > 360 days (χ2 = 18.82, P < 0.01; Table 2). The decreasing Cryptosporidium infection rate with increasing age is consistent with several recent studies conducted in Norway and China [28,30,31]. In contrast, no significant relationship was seen between the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and the sex of the dogs: the infection rate was 4.2% (15/353) in female dogs and 3.4% (14/417) in male dogs (χ2 = 0.42, P > 0.05). Two studies conducted in China and Brazil reported similar findings [22,32]. This indicates that sex is not a major issue affecting Cryptosporidium infection in dogs.

Table 2.

Cryptosporidium infection rates among dogs of different ages

Age No. samples No. positive Prevalence (95% CI) (%)
< 90 days
 251
 20
 8.0 ± 0.06
90–180 days
 150
 4
 2.7 ± 0.21
181–360 days
 98
 2
 2.0 ± 0.28
> 360 days
 271
 3
 1.1 ± 0.08
Total 770 29 3.8 ± 0.05
Open in a new tab

All 29 Cryptosporidium-positive samples were successfully amplified with nested PCR at the SSU rRNA locus. RFLP analysis of the SSU rRNA gene products revealed that these samples belonged to C. canis. DNA sequencing of the SSU rRNA PCR products from 12 C. canis-positive samples confirmed the identity of the species, with 100% similarity to dog- and human-derived C. canis sequences in GenBank [5]. To further evaluate the molecular characteristics of C. canis in this study, two C. canis isolates were sequenced at the HSP70 locus and eight at the actin locus. As expected, the two HSP70 sequences were identical to those obtained previously from dog-derived C. canis (AF221529) and coyote-derived C. canis (AY120920). Similarly, the four actin sequences (EU754834–EU754837) were identical to that of a dog-derived isolate (AF382340). The other four actin sequences (EU754838–EU754841) were identical to each other, and differed from isolates EU754834–EU754837 and AF382340 by only one nucleotide. Phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA, HSP70, and actin genes confirmed the identity of C. canis in this study.

As in this study, C. canis has been identified as the most common Cryptosporidium species in dogs around the world, although a few cases of C. parvum, C. muris, and C. meleagridis infection have also been reported [1,11,12,14,17,22,30,33-35]. Unlike C. parvum, C. canis appears to have a relatively high level of host adaptability. A few cases of C. canis have also been reported in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals in recent years [15,36-40]. Although a recent study suggested that cryptosporidiosis from pet dogs and cats poses only a minimal zoonotic risk, the possible public-health implications of C. canis and the economic significance of C. canis infections in dogs and other animals cannot be ignored [41].

Conclusion

In the present study, we described the occurrence and molecular characteristics of Cryptosporidium in dogs in China using a large number of samples. This provides useful information that may extend our understanding of the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infections in dogs. China has a large number of dogs, all of whom are in close contact with humans. Therefore, because only C. canis was identified in dogs in this study, it is possible that C. canis is an emerging zoonotic infectious agent in some parts of China.

Methods

Ethics statement

Before beginning work on the present study, we contacted animal owners and obtained their permission to include their animals in the study. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Administration Act 1988. Before the experiment, the protocol of the study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Henan Agricultural University.

Fecal samples and microscopic examination

Fresh fecal samples were collected from March 2006 to December 2009 from 26 locations in different places in Henan Province, China, including kennels, pet shops, pet hospitals, and a police canine center. A total of 770 samples were used in the study, including those from animals aged < 90, 90–180, 181–360, and > 360 days (Table 2). Fecal samples of at least 25 g were examined for the presence of Cryptosporidium oocysts using bright-field microscopy of the fecal material that had been concentrated with the formalin–ethyl acetate sedimentation method and Sheather’s sugar flotation technique [24]. Cryptosporidium-positive samples were stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate at 4°C.

DNA extraction

The genomic DNA from nine Cryptosporidium-positive samples from kennels, identified between 2006 and 2007, was extracted from the purified oocysts by discontinuous density sucrose gradient centrifugation using a MagExtractor–Genome kit (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The genomic DNA from the remaining 20 Cryptosporidium-positive samples from kennels, pet shops, and pet hospitals, identified between 2008 and 2009, was isolated using an E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA Kit (OMEGA Biotek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). DNA samples were stored at –20°C before molecular analysis.

Cryptosporidium genotyping

The SSU rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium was amplified from microscopy-positive samples using nested PCR, according to previously described procedures, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis [25], using the restriction enzymes SspI and VspI (Fermentas, Shenzhen, China). Two-directional sequencing of 12 representative samples (two from pet hospitals, four from pet shops, and six from kennels) was performed with an ABI Prism 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Some of the positive samples were further characterized by sequence analyses of the HSP70 gene (the two from pet shops and another two from kennels) and actin gene (the two from pet hospitals, the two from pet shops, and another four from kennels). The identities based on the gene loci of these samples were similar to those of the sequenced SSU rRNA samples. The primers and procedures used for these two loci were taken from previous studies [26,27]. The sequences of the actin genes were analyzed after the genes were cloned into the pGEM1-T Easy vector (Promega, Shanghai, China).

Data analysis

The sequences were analyzed using ClustalX 1.83 (http://www.clustal.org/) and Phylip 3.69 (http://cmgm.stanford.edu/phylip/). Representative sequences of the C. canis isolates were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU754826–EU754833 (SSU rRNA), EU754834–EU754841 (actin), and EU754842–EU754843 (HSP70). The χ2 test was used to compare the Cryptosporidium infection rates in the different groups of dogs. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LXZ conceived and designed the experiments; FCJ, MQ, and HPD performed the experiments; FCJ and RJW analyzed the data; XYH and CSN contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; FCJ and LXZ wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Fuchun Jian, Email: jfchun2008@163.com.

Meng Qi, Email: qimengdz@163.com.

Xiaoyi He, Email: 360085872@qq.com.

Rongjun Wang, Email: wrj-1978@163.com.

Sumei Zhang, Email: smzhang2815@henau.edu.cn.

Heping Dong, Email: peace1010@163.com.

Longxian Zhang, Email: zhanglx8999@gmail.com.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported, in part, by the Key National Science and Technology Specific Projects (no. 2012ZX10004-220), the Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) of the University of Henan Province (no. 2012IRTSTHN005), and the International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31110103901).

References

  1. Fayer R. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ren X, Zhao J, Zhang L, Ning C, Jian F, Wang R, Lv C, Wang Q, Arrowood MJ, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium tyzzeri n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in domestic mice (Mus musculus) Exp Parasitol. 2012;130(3):274–281. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Xiao L, Ryan U. Cryptosporidiosis: an update in molecular epidemiology. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17(5):483–490. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200410000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xiao L, Cama VA, Cabrera L, Ortega Y, Pearson J, Gilman RH. Possible transmission of Cryptosporidium canis between children and a dog in a household. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(6):2014–2016. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00503-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Xiao L, Fayer R. Molecular characterization of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38(11):1239–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Giangaspero A, Iorio R, Paoletti B, Traversa D, Capelli G. Molecular evidence for Cryptosporidium infection in dogs in central Italy. Parasitol Res. 2006;99(3):297–299. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Philip J, Lupo RC, Langer C, Mary R, Pablo CO, Cynthia LC. Cryptosporidium muris in a Texas Canine Population. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78(6):917–921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Himsworth CG, Skinner S, Chaban B, Jenkins E, Wagner BA, Harms NJ, Leighton FA, Thompson RC, Hill JE. Multiple Zoonotic Pathogens Identified in Canine Feces Collected from a Remote Canadian Indigenous Community. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(2):338–341. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beiromvand M, Akhlaghi L, Fattahi Massom SH, Meamar AR, Motevalian A, Oormazdi H, Razmjou E. Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal parasites in domestic and stray dogs in a rural area of Iran. Prev Vet Med. 2013;109(1–2):162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Uehlinger FD, Greenwood SJ, McClure JT, Conboy G, O'Handley R, Barkema HW. Zoonotic potential of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. and prevalence of intestinal parasites in young dogs from different populations on Prince Edward Island, Canada. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196(3–4):509–514. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller D, Liggett A, Radi Z, Branch L. Gastrointestinal cryptosporidiosis in a puppy. Vet Parasitol. 2003;115(3):199–204. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00237-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Molloy SF, Smith HV, Kirwan P, Nichols RA, Asaolu SO, Connelly L, Holland CV. Identification of a high diversity of Cryptosporidium species genotypes and subtypes in a pediatric population in Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82(4):608–613. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis AE, Brown CA, Miller DL. Diagnostic exercise: chronic vomiting in a dog. Vet Pathol. 2010;47(5):991–993. doi: 10.1177/0300985810375052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoshiuchi R, Matsubayashi M, KimataI I, Furuya M, Tani H, Sasai K. Survey and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in owned companion animal, dogs and cats, in Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2010;174(3-4):313–316. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scorza AV, Duncan C, Miles L, Lappin MR. Prevalence of selected zoonotic and vector-borne agents in dogs and cats in Costa Rica. Vet Parasitol. 2011;183(1–2):178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hajdusek O, Ditrich O, Slapeta J. Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in animal and human hosts from the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2004;122(3):183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gatei W, Barrett D, Lindo JF, Eldemire-Shearer D, Cama V, Xiao L. Unique Cryptosporidium population in HIV-infected persons Jamaica. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(5):841–843. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Elwin K, Hadfield SJ, Robinson G, Chalmers RM. The epidemiology of sporadic human infections with unusual cryptosporidia detected during routine typing in England and Wales, 2000-2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(4):673–683. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811000860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Q. Brief history of Chinese dog-raising (in Chinese) China J Dog raising. 1990;2:27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen J, Xu MJ, Zhou DH, Song HQ, Wang CR, Zhu XQ. Canine and feline parasitic zoonoses in China. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:152. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong H, Zhang L, Ning C, Wang Y, Yang H, Shi K, Gao G. Epidemiological investigation on cryptosporidiosis in dogs in Zhengzhou and experimental infection with oocysts derived from the dogs (in Chinese) Vet Sci China. 2007;37:854–858. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang J, Li P, Xue X, Chen X, Jiang S, Qiu X, Yin GL. Investigation on the infection situation of Crypotosporidium in dogs in Hefei city (in Chinese) Chin J Vet Parasitol. 2008;16(5):20–23. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma L, Wang G, Lu Y, Cai Q, Ye C, Li X, Niu X. ELISA detection of canie cryptosporidiosis in Qinghai province, China (in Chinese) J Vet Parasitol. 2010;18:65–67. [Google Scholar]
  24. McNabb SJ, Hensel DM, Welch DF, Heijbel H, McKee GL, Istre GR. Comparison of sedimentation and flotation techniques for identification of Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts in a large outbreak of human diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22(4):587–589. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.4.587-589.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Xiao L, Morgan UM, Limor J, Escalante A, Arrowood M, Shulaw W, Thompson RC, Fayer R, Lal AA. Genetic diversity within Cryptosporidium parvum and related Cryptosporidium species. Appl Environ Microbol. 1999;65(8):3386–3391. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.8.3386-3391.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sulaiman IM, Lal AA, Xiao L. Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium parasites at the actin locus. J Parasitol. 2002;88(2):388–394. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0388:MPAERO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sulaiman IM, Morgan UM, Thompson RC, Lal AA, Xiao L. Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the 70-kilodalton heat shock protein (HSP70) gene. Appl Environ Microbol. 2000;66(6):2385–2391. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2385-2391.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. El-Ahraf A, Tacal JVJ, Sobih M, Amin M, Lawrence W, Wilcke BW. Prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in dogs and human beings in San Bernardino County. California. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;198(4):631–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Irwin PJ. Companion animal parasitology: a clinical perspective. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32(5):581–593. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00361-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamnes IS, Gjerde BK, Robertson LJ. A longitudinal study on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in dogs during their first year of life. Acta Vet Scand. 2007;49:22–32. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu L, Li P, Gu Y, Xu W, Wang X, Qiu X, Yin G. Epidemiological survey of dog cryptosporidiosis in Hefei (in Chinese) J Anhui Sci Tech Univ. 2009;23:15–18. [Google Scholar]
  32. Huber F, Bomfim TCB, Gomes RS. Comparison between natural infection by Cryptosporidium sp. Giardia sp. in dogs in two living situations in the West Zone of the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Vet Parasitol. 2005;130(1–2):69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ederli BB, Rodrigues MF, Carvalho CB. Oocysts of the genus Cryptosporidium in domiciliated dogs from city of Campos dos Goytacazes, the State of Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2005;14(3):129–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mandarino-Pereira A, de Souza FS, Lopes CW, Pereira MJ. Prevalence of parasites in soil and dog feces according to diagnostic tests. Vet Parasitol. 2010;170(1–2):176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bajer A, Bednarska M, Rodo A. Risk factors and control of intestinal parasite infections in sled dogs in Poland. Vet Parasitol. 2011;175(3–4):343–350. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xiao L, Bern C, Limor J, Sulaiman I, Roberts J, Checkley W, Cabrera L, Gilman RH, Lal AA. Identification of 5 types of Cryptosporidium parasites in children in Lima. Peru. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):492–497. doi: 10.1086/318090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Caccio SM. Molecular epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis. Parassitologia. 2005;47(2):185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gatei W, Suputtamongkol Y, Waywa D, Ashford RW, Bailey JW, Greensill J, Beeching NJ, Hart CA. Zoonotic species of Cryptosporidium are as prevalent as the anthroponotic in HIV infected patients in Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96(8):797–802. doi: 10.1179/000349802125002202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Learmonth JJ, Ionas G, Ebbett KA, Kwan ES. Genetic characterization and transmission cycles of Cryptosporidium species isolated from humans in New Zealand. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(7):3973–3978. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.3973-3978.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Leoni F, Amar C, Nichols G, Pedraza-Diaz S, McLauchlin J. Genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from 2414 humans with diarrhea in England between 1985 and 2000. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(Pt 6):703–707. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46251-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dwight DB, Araceli LF. Cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in dogs and cats: veterinary and public health importance. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES