Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 21;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00004

Table 2.

Total cerebral blood flow.

Reference Aim of study Type of study n MCI n AD n VD n Controls Parameters Outcome
Albayrak et al. (2006) Comparison of cerebral blood flow in demented (AD, VD) and cognitively normal subjects, both with brain atrophy Cross-sectional 9 9 10 Flow velocities and cross-sectional area of the vessel in ICAs and VAs Total, anterior and right CBF lower in dementia, no difference between two types of dementia
Doepp et al. (2006) Possible differentiation of AD and VD by various extra- and intracranial ultrasound parameters Cross-sectional 20 20 12 Flow velocities and PI in MCAs, flow velocities and cross-sectional area in ICAs and VAs, cerebral circulation time, global cerebral blood volume No significant difference in trans- and extracranial ultrasound between AD and VD
Gusti et al. (2004) Comparison of carotid flow velocities and flow curve in AD and controls Cross-sectional 18 40 Flow velocities in carotid arteries Lower cerebral vascular filling in AD
Maalikjy Akkawi et al. (2003) Possibility of CBF volume assessment by TCD, difference between AD and controls, correlation with cognitive decline Cross-sectional 50 50 Flow velocities and vessel diameter in ICA and VA, calculation of cerebral blood flow Decrease in CBF volume in AD compared to controls, positive correlation between dementia severity and CBF
Schreiber et al. (2005) CBF, cerebral circulation time and cerebral blood volume in AD, VD and controls Cross-sectional 20 20 12 Flow velocity and cross-sectional area of ICA and VA, time of contrast agent transfer from ICA to IJV Difference in CBF and transit time between dementia and controls, no difference in CBF volume or between AD and VD

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CBF, cerebral blood flow; ICA, internal carotid artery; IJV, internal jugular vein; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; PI, pulsatility index; TCD, transcranial Doppler; VA, vertebral artery; VD, vascular dementia.