Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e155–e162. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.010

Table 3.

Frequencies of unique barriers by barrier category and their impact on time to resolution among participants with barriers compared to participants without barriers

Participants with breast
abnormalities (n=1995)
Participants with cervical
abnormalities (n=1194)
Barrier Group Frequency
n (%)
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
Frequency
n (%)
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
Any Barrier 1,270 (63.7) 0.74** (0.67–0.83) 556 (46.6) 0.79** (0.70–0.90)
Patient-Focused 827 (41.5) 0.81** (0.72–0.91) 352 (29.5) 0.78** (0.68–0.90)
Other-Focused 616 (30.9) 0.98 (0.87–1.09) 157 (13.1) 0.78** (0.65–0.94)
System 856 (42.9) 0.78** (0.70–0.87) 260 (21.8) 0.82* (0.70–0.95)
*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01 (significant findings in bold font)

Adjusted HRs estimated from multivariable Cox model stratified by study site with covariates age, race/ethnicity, marital status, and health insurance.