Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):5–21. doi: 10.1310/tsr2001-5

Table 1.

Clinical Studies of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Aphasia

Study authors and design Subjects tDCS polarity Targeted
hemisphere and
electrode
location
tDCS
procedures
per condition
or per arm
Concurrent
Behavioral
treatment
Results
Monti et al, 200818
Crossover study; 4 subjects received anodal/sham conditions and 4 subjects received cathodal/sham conditions
N=8
Chronic
Nonfluent aphasia (4 global, 4 Broca’s).
Anodal/sham
Cathodal/sham
Left
Fronto-temporal area
Single session
10 minutes at 2 mA.
None Significantly improved naming accuracy with cathodal stimulation
Fiori et al, 201026
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=3
Chronic
Nonfluent aphasia classified as mild, moderate and severe.
Anodal/sham Left
Wernicke’s area.
5 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 1mA
Associative picture naming training of 2 different word lists Improved naming accuracy in both conditions, but greater improvement in the anodic versus sham condition.
Baker et al, 201024
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=10
Chronic
6 fluent and 4 nonfluent aphasia
Anodal/sham Left
Frontal cortex
5 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 1mA.
Self-administered Computerized Anomia Treatment consisting of spoken word picture matching Significantly improved naming of treated items after anodal tDCS vs sham tDCS.
Fridiriksson et al, 201127
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=8
Chronic
Fluent aphasia with posterior cortical or subcortical lesions.
Anodal/sham Left
Posterior cortex
5 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 1 mA.
Self-administered Computerized Anomia Treatment consisting of spoken word-picture matching Greater reduction of RT for naming trained nouns after anodal tDCS vs sham tDCS on immediate post-testing and at 3 weeks follow-up.
Kang et al, 201121
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=10
Chronic
3 global, 4 Broca’s, 1 transcortical motor, 2 anomic.
Cathodal/sham Right
Broca’s homologue area.
5 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 2 mA.
Word-retrieval Training provided by SLP Improved response accuracy of picture naming relative to baseline with cathodal tDCS; sham stimulation had little effect.
You et al, 201120
RCT with 3 arms
N= 21
Subacute (TPO: 16 – 38 days)
Global aphasia.
Anodal
Cathodal
Sham
Both Left and Right (this RCT had three different study arms)
Anodal tDCS to L superior temporal gyrus
Cathodal tDCS to R superior temporal gyrus
Sham tDCS to L superior temporal gyrus,
10 Consecutive sessions, 5 times a week for 2 weeks
30 minutes at 2 mA
“Conventional speech-language therapy” Cathodal tDCS to right superior temporal area showed significantly greater improvements in auditory verbal comprehension than other arms.
Marangola et al, 201125
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=3
Chronic
Nonfluent aphasia with severe apraxia of speech.
Anodal/sham Left
Inferior frontal gyrus
5 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 1 mA
Repetition of syllables and words. Significant effect of training i.e. improvement in both anodal and sham conditions.
Retention of achieved improvement only for the anodal condition.
Vines et al, 201123
Crossover study with 2 conditions
N=6
Chronic
Moderate - severe nonfluent Broca’s aphasia
Anodal/sham Right
Posterior inferior frontal gyrus
3 Consecutive Daily sessions
20 minutes at 1.2mA
Melodic Intonation Therapy Significantly greater improvement in verbal fluency with anodal tDCS than sham tDCS. condition.
Floel et al, 201122
Crossover study with 3 conditions
N=12
Chronic
7 Brocas, 1 Wernickes, 2 amnestic, 1 global and 1 not classified
Anodal, cathodal and sham Right
Temporoparietal cortex
Two times each day for 3 days 20 minutes at 1 mA Computer assisted naming therapy - 1 set of 15 objects trained in each condition 2 hours per day; the first 20 minutes of each hour was concurrent with tDCS Main effect of stimulation with greatest improvement on anodal tDCS. Cathodal tDCS showed greater gains compared to sham immediately after treatment but effect not maintainedat follow-up.

L = left; RT = response time; R = right; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SLP = speech-language pathologist; TPO = time post onset.