Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 22;4:1021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01021

Table 1.

Absolute and relative frequency (percentages) of best fitting models indicating direct estimation, proportion judgments or other estimation strategies (left column) and detailed distribution of best fitting model of participants' estimates (right column) separated for bounded and unbounded number line tasks and age groups.

Estimation strategies Model fittings
Direct Proportional other Linear Unbounded power Dual scallop Multi scallop One- cycle Two- cycle
BOUNDED TASK
1st grade 40 (85) 7 (15) 0 30 (64) 10 (21) 0 0 4 (9) 3 (6)
2nd grade 32 (74) 9 (21) 2 (5) 22 (51) 10 (23) 1 (2) 1 (2) 5 (12) 4 (9)
3rd grade 17 (31) 37 (69) 0 4 (7) 13 (24) 0 0 25 (46) 12 (22)
4th grade 15 (35) 28 (65) 0 5 (12) 10 (23) 0 0 8 (19) 20 (47)
Adults 37 (70) 16 (30) 0 12 (23) 25 (47) 0 0 7 (13) 9 (17)
UNBOUNDED TASK
1st grade 40 (85) 4 (9) 3 (6) 15 (32) 25 (53) 2 (4) 1 (2) 4 (9) 0
2nd grade 39 (91) 4 (9) 0 17 (40) 22 (51) 0 0 3 (7) 1 (2)
3rd grade 50 (93) 0 4 (7) 12 (22) 38 (70) 2 (4) 2 (4) 0 0
4th grade 39 (91) 2 (5) 2 (5) 10 (23) 29 (67) 1 (2) 1 (2) 2 (5) 0
Adults 45 (85) 2 (4) 6 (11) 16 (30) 29 (55) 2 (4) 4 (8) 2 (4) 0

The best fitting models are indicated in bold script.