Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 8;13:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-12

Table 1.

Comparison of estimates of seroconversion rate (SCR) and duration of seropositivity to MSP1 19 using catalytic and superinfection models fitted to data from 12 villages/sites in Tanzania

Villages
Altitude (meters)
§ Catalytic model[5](1)
§ Superinfection model (2)
((2) – (1))*100 / (1)
% change in Std. Err.
Predicted EIR[18]
    SCR (Std. Err.) SCR (Std. Err.) % change in SCR    
Mgila
375
0.1228 (0.0139)
0.1451 (0.0116)
18
-17
39.1002
Kadando
528
0.0959 (0.0104)
0.1097 (0.0098)
14
-6
16.3467
Kambi ya Simba
746
0.0753 (0.0067)
0.0857 (0.0073)
14
6
4.7182
Ngulu
832
0.0869 (0.0077)
0.0980 (0.0080)
13
4
2.8899
Tamota
1055
0.0574 (0.0061)
0.0726 (0.0066)
26
8
0.8107
Goha
1163
0.0239 (0.0028)
0.0306 (0.0034)
28
24
0.438
Lambo
1188
0.0099 (0.0017)
0.0123 (0.0021)
25
24
0.3799
Funta
1240
0.1033 (0.0108)
0.1197 (0.0101)
16
-7
0.2824
Mpinji
1445
0.0065 (0.0012)
0.0083 (0.0015)
27
29
0.0878
Kilomeni
1556
0.0046 (0.0010)
0.0058 (0.0013)
27
27
0.0466
Kwadoe
1564
0.0071 (0.0015)
0.0092 (0.0019)
29
29
0.0445
Bwambo
1598
0.0041 (0.0009)
0.0054 (0.0012)
31
30
0.0367
Average
 
 
22
 
 
Reversion rate
0.0139 (0.0029)
0.0426 (0.0062)
 
 
 
Duration in years 72 23      

§ The models were estimated using Stata software’s ml command; Standard errors were approximated to 4 decimal places but actual values were used in calculating the % change.