Table 3.
|
Treatment2 |
|
P-value |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sham |
E. coli
|
|
Main effect3 |
CON vs. SM4 |
|||||||||
Item | CON | SMA | SMB | ZEO | CON | SMA | SMB | ZEO | SEM | E. coli | Diet | E x D | Sham | E. coli |
d −6 to 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADG, g |
6.25 |
29.17 |
−2.08 |
−25.00 |
12.50 |
−25.00 |
33.33 |
8.33 |
42.4 |
0.80 |
0.86 |
0.38 |
0.87 |
0.84 |
ADFI, g |
394 |
442 |
319 |
367 |
421 |
421 |
329 |
406 |
212 |
0.74 |
0.31 |
0.96 |
0.79 |
0.60 |
d 0 to 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADG, g |
237 |
180 |
157 |
187 |
137 |
132 |
122 |
85 |
63.71 |
< 0.01 |
0.52 |
0.73 |
0.16 |
0.58 |
ADFI, g |
715 |
715 |
557 |
632 |
632 |
627 |
455 |
517 |
193 |
0.11 |
0.15 |
1.00 |
0.42 |
0.32 |
G:F5 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.048 | 0.11 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.95 |
1n = 8 pigs/treatment.
2Sham = unchallenged; E. coli = E. coli challenged; CON = control diet; SMA = 0.3% smectite A; SMB = 0.3% smectite B; ZEO = 0.3% zeolite.
3E. coli = E. coli challenge effect; Diet = diet effect; E x D = interaction between E. coli and diet effects.
4Contrast between CON and all clay treatments within challenge treatments.
5G:F was not reported for period −6 to 0 because of the negative values for ADG.