Table 5.
Effects of clays on bacteria in lymph nodes of pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic E. coli1
| |
Treatment2 |
|
P-value |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Sham |
E. coli
|
|
Main effect3 |
CON vs. Clays4 |
|||||||||
| Item | CON | SMA | SMB | ZEO | CON | SMA | SMB | ZEO | SEM | E. coli | Diet | E x D | Sham | E. coli |
| Log10 CFU5 | 1.05 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.87 | 2.12 | 2.03 | 1.69 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.44 | 0.87 |
1n = 64 (8 pigs/treatment).
2Sham = unchallenged; E. coli = E. coli challenged; CON = control diet; SMA = 0.3% smectite A; SMB = 0.3% smectite B; ZEO = 0.3% zeolite.
3E. coli = E. coli challenge effect; Diet = diet effect; E x D = interaction between E. coli and diet effects.
4Contrast between CON and all clay treatments within challenge treatments.
5Log10 CFU/g of lymph node.