Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2013 Dec 18;1(3):305–320. doi: 10.1017/nws.2013.18

Table 5.

Comparison of social network composition measures for long-term homelessness and near-term homelessness.

Number of Long-term Homelessness: Mean (Std. Dev.) Near-Term Homelessness: Mean (Std. Dev.)

Chronic Non-Chronic F Sig. Continuous Intermittent F Sig.
Family Members 4.47 (4.51) 4.53 (4.55) 0.01 0.93 3.98 (4.13) 5.02 (4.84) 4.10 0.04
Sex Partners 3.07 (3.59) 2.83 (2.47) 0.21 0.65 3.15 (3.75) 2.90 (3.04) 0.41 0.52
Other Homeless 3.98 (4.96) 3.25 (3.73) 1.05 0.31 4.83 (5.29) 2.80 (3.88) 14.50 <0.001
Alters who Drink to Intoxication 6.19 (5.55) 7.55 (6.54) 2.49 0.12 6.96 (5.73) 5.86 (5.73) 2.78 0.10
Alters who Use Drugs 6.04 (5.91) 5.53 (5.89) 0.33 0.56 6.66 (6.11) 5.19 (5.58) 4.79 0.03
Alters who Have Risky Sex 3.91 (5.16) 4.94 (6.02) 1.66 0.20 4.85 (5.69) 3.27 (4.78) 6.85 0.01
‘Responsible’ Alters 0.78 (1.87) 1.11 (1.66) 1.41 0.24 0.52 (1.17) 1.18 (2.31) 10.21 <0.001
Alters who Care About Respondent 6.80 (5.83) 5.01 (4.47) 4.48 0.04 6.26 (5.74) 6.72 (5.57) 0.50 0.48
Alters who Provide Support to Respondent 8.09 (6.23) 6.31 (4.63) 3.94 0.05 7.37 (6.05) 8.22 (5.97) 1.53 0.22