Table 2.
Ranks of method performance in the four evaluation criteria
| Targeted HS | Power detection | Biological association | Stability | Robustness | Rank Sum | MDS *1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PR |
HS
A
|
12 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
26 |
1 |
| SR |
HS
A
|
11 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
33 |
1 |
| maxP |
HS
A
|
9 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
42 |
2 |
|
rOP |
HS
r
|
7 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
32 |
2 |
| REM |
HS
r
|
10 |
11 |
5 |
8 |
34 |
3 |
|
Fisher |
HS
B
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
| AW |
HS
B
|
2 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
13 |
1 |
| Stouffer |
HS
B
|
3 |
1 |
8 |
4 |
16 |
1 |
| minP |
HS
B
|
4 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
19 |
1 |
| RankProd |
HS
B
|
8 |
8 |
1 |
5 |
22 |
3 |
| RankSum |
HS
B
|
6 |
12 |
2 |
12 |
32 |
3 |
| FEM | HS B | 5 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 34 | 3 |
*1Cluster number of methods in the MDS plot (Figure 1(a)).