Table 4.

Comparisons between good and poor subliminal encoders.

Brain region	BA	Left/right	MNI-coordinates			k	t	z
			x	y	z
GOOD > POOR SUBLIMINAL ENCODERS, ONE-TRIAL ENCODING (WORDS > NONWORDS)
Middle cingulate gyrus	23	R	6	−14	30	39	4.41	3.72
Hippocampus		L	−30	−40	2	35	4.6	3.83
Hippocampus		L	−38	−20	−16	56	4.16	3.56
GOOD > POOR SUBLIMINAL ENCODERS, NINE-TRIAL ENCODING (LINEAR INCREASE)
Postcentral gyrus	4	L	−60	−18	46	29	5.44	4.28
Hippocampus, rhinal cortex		L	−30	−16	−24	13	3.42	3.03
Rhinal cortex		R	26	−24	−20	23	3.64	3.19
INTERACTION OF RETRIEVAL CONDITION WITH SUBLIMINAL ENCODING QUALITY (ANALOGS > BROKEN ANALOGS, GOOD > POOR SUBLIMINAL ENCODERS)
Parahippocampal gyrus		L	−20	−32	−16	51	3.9	3.74
Hippocampus		L	−40	−32	−4	19	3.26	3.17

N = 51; statistical maps thresholded at p = 0.005, k = 0 in medial and anterior temporal lobe regions, all other regions p = 0.001, k = 20.