Table 1.
Reference | Recording area | No. neurons | No. mirror | % mirror | 1Action specificity | Observed effector |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bonini et al.[5] | F5 | 154 | 36 | 23.4% | y | Hand |
Caggiano et al.[6] | F5 | 299 | 149 | 49.8% | n | Hand |
Caggiano et al.[8] | F5 | 219 | 105 | 48% | n | Hand |
Caggiano et al.[7] | F5 | 224 | 123 | 54.9% | n | Hand (video) |
Caggiano et al.[9] | F5 | 785 | 247 | 31.5% | n | Hand (video) |
Ferrari et al.[11] | F5 | 485 | 130 | 26.8% | y | Mouth |
Ferrari et al.[12] | F5 | 209 | 52 | 24.9% | y | Hand |
Gallese et al.[2] | F5 | 532 | 92 | 17.3% | y | Hand |
Kohler et al.[16]2 | F5 | 497 | 63 | 12.7% | y | Auditory |
Kraskov et al.[17] | F5 | 64 | 31 | 48.4% | y | Hand (PTNs) |
di Pellegrino et al.[1] | F5 | 184 | 18 | 9.8% | y | Hand |
Rizzolatti et al.[18] | F5 | 300 | 60 | 20% | y | Hand |
Rochat et al.[19] | F5 | 282 | 92 | 32.6% | y | Hand |
Umilta et al.[23] | F5 | 220 | 103 | 46.8% | y | Hand |
Bonini et al.[5] | IPL | 120 | 28 | 23.3% | y | Hand |
Fogassi et al.[13] | IPL | 165 | 41 | 24.8% | y | Hand |
Rozzi et al.[20] | IPL | 423 | 51 | 12% | y | Hand |
Shepherd et al.[21] | LIP | 153 | 30 | 19.6% | n | Eye-gaze |
Dushanova and Donoghue [10] | M1 | 303 | 105 | 34.6% | y | Reaching |
Tkach et al.[22] | M1 | 829 | 581 | 70.1% | y | Tracking arm |
Vigneswaran et al.[24] | M1 | 132 | 77 | 58.3% | n | Hand (PTNs) |
Tkach et al.[22] | PMd | 128 | 77 | 60.1% | y | Tracking arm |
Ishida et al.[14] | VIP | 541 | 48 | 8.9% | y | Bimodal tactile/visual |
Fujii et al.[27] | PM3 | 148 | _ | 3–14%4 | n | Hand |
IPS5 | 148 | - | 10–42%4 | n |
This column indicates if mirror neurons were tested for any form of action specificity.
These data were further analysed by Keysers et al. [15].
Including area F5.
See text.
Included anterior bank of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). PTN, pyramidal tract neuron.