Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2013 Nov 26;385(2):160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.11.019

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison between measurements by NanoString and RNA-seq. (A) Measurements of 173 genes in nine samples of different embryonic developmental stages. (B) An example (FoxF) of time course profiles measured by NanoString and RNA-seq. The correlation coefficient between the two profiles is 0.919. Solid line: NanoString; Dashed line: RNA-seq. (C) The distribution of correlation coefficients of the time course profiles measured by NanoString and RNAseq for each gene. The median value is 0.923. See also Figure S1.