Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 20;382(9909):1993–2002. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61887-5

Table 2.

MERS-CoV genome variation in support of human transmission pairs

Δ time (days) Recorded substitutions Expected substitutions p value*(X≥observation)
ASR vs B 34 0 1·869 1
ASR vs F 28 3 0·714 3·58 × 10−2
ASR vs G 30 2 1·494 4·40 × 10−1
ASR vs H 28 1 1·436 7·62 × 10−1
ASR vs I 19 0 1·045 1
ASR vs J 18 1 0·985 6·26 × 10−1
F vs K 0 3 0 NA
G vs X 6 7 0·139 1·76 × 10−10
G vs M 1 4 0·018 4·55 × 10−9
J vs Q 16 8 0·332 2·74 × 10−9
K vs V 8 0 0·422 1
Q vs T 5 9 0·106 4·00 × 10−15
X vs Y 2 7 0·057 3·50 × 10−13

MERS-CoV=Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. ASR=likelihood-based ancestral state reconstruction of the root of the Al-Hasa clade.

*

p values for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis are significant at the 0·05 level, after using the Bonferroni correction to adjust the p value for each hypothesis to 3·85 × 10−3.

The samples from F and K were collected on the same day resulting in an expected substitution value of 0. Therefore no conclusions could be made for this pair.

Transmission pair not statistically supported.