Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;134(3):890–897. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.034496

Table I.

RL-SAGE modifications compared with LongSAGE and conventional SAGE methods

Library Features RL-SAGE LongSAGE (Saha et al., 2002) Conventional SAGE (Velculescu et al., 1995)
   1. mRNA quantity 50 ng 2 μg 5 μg
   2. Ligation of cDNAs to adapters Overnight Not reported 2 h
   3. cDNA digestion with N/aIII 2.5 h 1 h 1 h
   4. Ditag ligation Overnight 2.5 h overnight
   5. Number of PCRs 20 PCRs Not reported 300 PCRs
   6. Ditags (136 bp) band purification Individual PCR resolved Not reported PCR products pooled, precipitated, and resolved
   7. Purification of ditags (40 bp) 16% (w/v) Polyacrylamide gel Not reported 12% (w/v) Polyacrylamide gel
   8. Linkers removed M-280 streptavidin Dynabeads Not reported Not reported
   9. Digestion of concatemers 10 units of N/aIII (37°C, 1 min) Not reported Not reported
10. Purification of concatemers 6% (w/v) Polyacrylamide gel Not reported 8% (w/v) Polyacrylamide gel
11. Clones screened Randomly picked Not reported Colony PCR screened
12. Average insert size 1.00 kb Not reported 300—500 bp
13. Total tags per concatemer 50 tags (21 bp) Not reported 22 tags (14 bp)