Table 3.
In vivo study 1 (Figure 1) | In vivo study 2 (Figure 3) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primers | Lin. slope | Efficiency (%) | Range (CT) | Primer conc. | Lin. slope | Efficiency (%) | Range (CT) | Primer conc. | ||
miR-1 | −3.12 | 106 | 18.3–22.3 | 20X | −3.55 | 94 | 21.6–24.9 | 20X | ||
miR-133a | −3.18 | 104 | 18.6–22.7 | −3.22 | 103 | 20.4–23.3 | ||||
miR-133b | −3.49 | 95 | 19.6–22.9 | −3.27 | 102 | 19.7–22.7 | ||||
miR-206 | 3.5 | 95 | 21.6–24.6 | −3.21 | 104 | 23.2–26.2 | ||||
RNU48 | - | - | - | - | −3.38 | 98 | 27.4–30.5 | |||
MYOD | - | - | - | - | −3.42 | 97 | 24.9–29.0 | F: 300 nM R: 300 nM | ||
MYOG | - | - | - | - | −3.15 | 105 | 22.7–26.5 | |||
MYF-5 | - | - | - | - | −3.28 | 101 | 25.5–29.3 | |||
AR | - | - | - | - | −3.51 | 95 | 23.7–28.0 | |||
18S | −3.26 | 102 | 14.7–18.5 | F: 300 nM R: 300 nM | −3.44 | 97 | 13.0–17.2 | |||
Mice study (Figure 4) | In vitro study (Figure 5) | |||||||||
miR-1 | −3.28 | 101 | 18.1–21.8 | 20X | −3.47 | 96 | 28.1–32.3 | 20X | ||
miR-133a | −3.35 | 99 | 16.6–20.7 | −3.59 | 92 | 24.9–29.2 | ||||
miR-133b | −3.35 | 99 | 17.2–21.3 | 3.46 | 96 | 24.5–28.7 | ||||
miR-206 | −3.41 | 97 | 24.4–27.5 | −3.49 | 95 | 22.9–27.1 | ||||
RNU48 | - | - | - | - | −3.16 | 105 | 26.8–30.7 | |||
MYOD/Myod | −3.25 | 102 | 22.8–26.8 | F: 300 nM R: 300 nM | −3.47 | 96 | 22.7–26.9 | F: 300 nM R: 300 nM | ||
MYOG/Myog | −3.83 | 88 | 25.3–29.1 | −3.36 | 99 | 20.5–24.5 | ||||
MYF-5/Myf-5 | −3.8 | 84 | 26.1–31.0 | −3.53 | 94 | 22.5–26.8 | ||||
AR/Ar | −3.19 | 104 | 22.9–25.8 | −3.46 | 96 | 27.1–31.2 | ||||
18S | −3.36 | 99 | 13.4–17.4 | −3.5 | 95 | 13.7–18.1 |
PCR efficiency, linearity slope, cycle threshold range and concentration for each primer used in the study.