. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 23.

Published in final edited form as: Dent Mater. 2013 Aug 14;29(10):999–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.016

Table 2.

Percentage change of the bond strength between immediate and aged values in the experiments in which Clearfil Protect Bond has been evaluated.

Author, year	Duration (months)	Adhesive	% change
Nakajima et al. 2003 [97]	6	Clearfil SE Bond	−47.1^*
Nakajima et al. 2003 [97]	6	Clearfil Protect Bond	−7.5

Donmez et al. 2005 (in vivo) [17]	12	Clearfil SE Bond	−35,2^*
Donmez et al. 2005 (in vivo) [17]	12	Clearfil Protect Bond	3.9

Donmez et al. 2005 (in vitro) [17]	12	Clearfil SE Bond	−36.9^*
Donmez et al. 2005 (in vitro) [17]		Clearfil Protect Bond	0.7

Ansari et al. 2008 (microshear) [98]	12	Clearfil SE Bond	−25.0
		Clearfil 3S Bond	−9.7
		Clearfil Protect Bond	35.1^*

Erhardt et al. 2008 [176]	6	Scotchbond 1	−9.9
		AdheSE	−3.5
		Clearfil Protect Bond	0.8

Reis et al. 2008 [177]	12	Prime&Bond NT	−41.2^*
		Single Bond	−25.2^*
		Clearfil SE Bond	−45.5^*
		One-up Bond	−29.1
		Clearfil Protect Bond	−21.7^*

Shinohara et al. 2009 [99]	3	SB MultiPurpose	−14.0^*
		Clearfil SE Bond	0.2
		Clearfil Protect Bond	13.2^*

De Munck et al. 2010 [40]	12	Single Bond	−49.5^*
		G-Bond	−66.2^*
		Clearfil Protect Bond	−33.5^*

Van Landuyt et al. 2010 [15]	12	Optibond FL	−13.1
		Clearfil SE Bond	−42.8^*
		G-Bond	−53.1^*
		iBond	−58.7^*
		Clearfil 3S Bond	−62.0^*
		Clearfil Protect Bond	−29.1

De Munck et al. 2011 [100]	12	OptiBond FL	−47.2^*
		ScotchBond 1 XT	−70.0^*
		Clearfil SE Bond	−47.9^*
		G-Bond	−72.4^*
		Protect Bond	−51.6^*

indicates statistically signficant difference to the respective immediate bond strength as reported in the publication