Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Educ Rev. 2013 Jun 26;36:88–107. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.007

Table 4.

Lunches served per student (log) by school type and eligibility group, school years 2002–03 & 2003–04.

Traditional only
Traditional & UFM
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Reduced −0.50*** (0.04) −0.50*** (0.04) −0.23*** (0.02) −0.22*** (0.02)
Full −0.97*** (0.06) −0.97*** (0.05) −0.53*** (0.05) −0.52*** (0.05)
Post × Free −0.01 (0.01) 0.02 (0.01) −0.02*** (0.01) −0.01 (0.01)
Post × Reduced 0.02 (0.04) 0.05 (0.04) −0.03*** (0.01) −0.01 (0.01)
Post × Full −0.03 (0.06) −0.01 (0.06) −0.05 (0.05) −0.01 (0.05)
Traditional × Free −0.04 (0.02) −0.62 (0.71)
Traditional × Reduced −0.31*** (0.05) −0.90 (0.71)
Traditional × Full −0.48*** (0.08) −1.07 (0.71)
Post × Traditional × Free 0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (0.02)
Post × Traditional × Reduced 0.05 (0.04) 0.05 (0.04)
Post × Traditional × Full 0.02 (0.07) −0.00 (0.08)
Constant 4.75*** (0.07) 5.21*** (0.69) 4.88*** (0.08) 4.04*** (0.65)
School fixed effects No Yes No Yes
R-sqr 0.317 0.403 0.314 0.610
No. schools 309 309 667 667
No. observations 1743 1743 3490 3490

Note: Models include demographic controls not shown (percent Asian, Black, Hispanic, eligible for free/reduced lunch), elementary school dummy, and clustered standard errors. Sample is a balanced panel of schools that did not switch UFM status. Columns 1–2 include all traditional schools. Columns 3–4 include traditional and UFM schools.

*

p < 0.10.

**

p < 0.05.

***

p < 0.010.