Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086181

Table 2. Comparison between distance-effect models using logistic regression with distance variables for each linear landscape features partly including interaction terms for seasons according to log-likelihood (LL), AIC, and AIC score as changes in AIC from the lowest model (Δi).

Model Road_open_dist Road_forest_dist Forest_edge_dist River_dist
LL AIC Δi LL AIC Δi LL AIC Δi LL AIC Δi
D+D2+D:SS+SS:LC+SS:SX −58865 117777 0 −58943 117931 0 −59296 118638 0 −59780 119607 0
D+D2+D:SS+SS:LC −58878 117799 22 −58967 117976 45 −59316 118675 37 −59794 119631 24
D+D2+D:SS+LC −60092 120193 2416 −59889 119791 1859 −60415 120842 2204 −60929 121871 2264
D+D2+D:SS+SS:SX −60150 120315 2538 −59925 119863 1932 −60452 120919 2281 −60977 121968 2361
D+D2+D:SS+SX −60152 120197 2420 −59928 119869 1938 −60457 120925 2287 −60982 121977 2370
D+D2+D:SS −60155 120320 2544 −59939 119888 1957 −60462 120934 2296 −60985 121980 2373
D+D2+SS −60465 120938 3161 −60054 120117 2186 −61198 122405 3767 −61168 122344 2737
D+D2 −60709 121423 3647 −60216 120439 2508 −61340 122687 4049 −61306 122617 3010
D −60721 121447 3670 −60627 121259 3327 −61344 122692 4054 −61322 122648 3041

The variable names: continuous distance (D), quadratic terms of distance (D2), season (SS), sex (SX), land cover (LC) and three interactions with season (D:SS, SS:SX, SS:LC).