Table 3.
Comparisons between clusters with regard to characterization data at Time 1 and Time 2. Intensity of intervention was included as a covariate.
| Outcome measure | Factor/Covariate | F value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADOS-G Total Score (N=65) | Cluster | 4.87 | .009 |
| Visit | 16.72 | <.001 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 1.41 | .36 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 2.16 | .15 | |
| ADOS Comparison Score (N=65) | Cluster | 1.49 | .23 |
| Visit | 0.09 | .77 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 0.78 | .46 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 2.32 | .13 | |
| Vineland II Socialization (N=62) | Cluster | 2.16 | .13 |
| Visit | 2.12 | .15 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 1.90 | .16 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 4.51 | .04 | |
| Nonverbal DQ (N=64) | Cluster | 7.81 | .001 |
| Visit | 0.29 | .60 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 2.38 | .10 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 5.22 | .03 | |
| Verbal DQ (N=64) | Cluster | 7.66 | .001 |
| Visit | 62.51 | <.001 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 4.01 | .02 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 0.03 | .87 | |
| Vineland II Communication (N=62) | Cluster | 4.12 | .02 |
| Visit | 44.03 | <.001 | |
| Cluster × Visit | 4.37 | .02 | |
| Intensity of Intervention | 1.98 | .16 |