Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2013 Jul 11;67(1):74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.037

Table 2.

Sequence return and mapping outcomes for PAT samples.

Sample Method Raw tag# mapped to chromosomes Percent mapped to chromosomes (P) mapped to 3'UTRs Percent mapped to 3'UTRs (Q) Percent difference (P–Q) mapped to rRNA Percent mapped to rRNA
LAa A 5903191 1426870 24.2 1241190 21.0 3.2 55811 0.9
LAb A 2240223 500853 22.4 40708 1.8 20.6 441263 19.7
LAc A 4369955 2035046 46.6 1940928 44.4 2.2 40040 0.9
LB1a B1 3625226 1687692 46.6 1448073 39.9 6.7 100783 2.8
LB1b B1 2465522 524793 21.3 425417 17.3 4.0 7198 0.3
LB1c B1 4696988 1964073 41.8 931280 19.8 22.0 618325 13.2
LB1d B1 1253316 408552 32.6 324224 25.9 6.7 5557 0.4
LB1e B1 4690393 1550875 33.1 732746 15.6 17.5 450788 9.6
LB1f B1 4850319 1895655 39.1 811363 16.7 22.4 631594 13.0
LB2a B2 4087200 2166330 53.0 1876339 45.9 7.1 29626 0.7
LB2b B2 5403906 2939240 54.4 2588520 47.9 6.5 34489 0.6
SAa A 2732659 771700 28.2 427450 15.6 12.6 213493 7.8
SBb A 7278302 3288851 45.2 2822544 38.8 6.4 100341 1.4
SB1a B1 712815 432544 60.7 376695 52.8 7.9 3589 0.5
SB1b B1 2714976 1189015 43.8 995858 36.7 7.1 17144 0.6
SB2a B2 3843750 2456458 63.9 222117 5.8 58.1 1816784 47.3
SB2b B2 1868146 1101186 58.9 404871 21.7 37.2 450486 24.1
SB2c B2 965054 666876 69.1 352258 36.5 32.6 179290 18.6
imB1a B1 1069393 377199 35.3 281192 26.3 7.0 8646 0.8
imB1b B1 1814431 629821 34.7 523215 28.8 5.9 12947 0.7
imB1c B1 2003382 632961 31.6 495661 24.7 6.9 20252 1.0

Sample key: LA(a,b,c) – leaf PATs, prepared using Method A; LB1(a–f) – leaf PATs, prepared using Method B1; LB2(a,b) – leaf PATs prepared using Method B2; SA(a,b) – wild-type dry seed PATs, prepared using Method A; SB1(a,b) – wild type dry seed PATs, prepared using Method B1; SB2(a,b,c) – tt2-5 dry seed PATs, prepared using Method B2; imB1(a,b,c) – wild type seed imbibed for 48 hrs, prepared using Method B1