. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Informetr. 2014 Jan;8(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.006

TABLE 2.

Explaining Collaboration Relation on Grant Proposals (p^*/ERGM results)

		Full Model	Awarded Model	Un-awarded Model
	Isolates (single author)	5.447^* (1.108)	10.138^* (2.516)	4.477^* (1.197)
	Edge (proposal collaboration relation)	−6.751^* (0.041)	−5.341^* (0.115)	−6.571^* (0.044)
	Weighted degree (negative measure of preferential attachment)	4.623^* (1.082)	8.908^* (2.472)	3.779^* (1.171)
	Individual Attributes
H1	Gender (Female)	0.021 (0.012)	0.119^* (0.024)	−0.009 (0.013)
H2	Tenure (Years since PhD)	0.002^* (0.000)	0.001 (0.001)	0.002^* (0.000)
H3	Institution tier (Top 10% University)	−0.098^* (0.009)	−0.098^* (0.019)	−0.104^* (0.011)
H4	H-index	−0.014^* (0.001)	−0.005^* (0.001)	−0.009^* (0.001)
	Relations
H5 & H7	Co-authorship relation	2.431^* (0.076)	1.386^* (0.055)	0.914^* (0.035)
H6 & H8	Citation relation	1.132^* (0.049)	−0.147^* (0.014)	−0.008 (0.007)
	Observations	2,186	445	1,834

Standard errors in parentheses

Indicates p<0.05