Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 20;7:10.3402/gha.v7.23190. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23190

Table 2.

Technical efficiency (TE), Scale efficiency (SE) and Malmquist index scores for 2008 and 2009

2008 2009 2008–2009



Health post TE (VRS) SE TE (VRS) SE Efficiency change Technical change TFP change
Sepoc 0.386 0.50 (drs) 0.451 0.56 (drs) 1.31 1.08 1.41
Cojaj 1.000 1 0.793 0.34 (drs) 0.27 1.49 0.40
San Agustin 0.948 1 1.000 0.56 (drs) 0.59 1.72 1.01
Chitocan 1.000 1 1.000 0.66 (drs) 0.66 1.07 0.70
Puribal 0.604 1 0.472 0.66 (drs) 0.52 1.01 0.52
Salacuim 0.791 1 0.734 0.50 (drs) 0.47 1.47 0.69
Saxoc 1.000 1 0.893 0.59 (drs) 0.53 1.12 0.59
Secopur 0.798 1 0.799 0.50 (drs) 0.50 1.62 0.81
Choval 0.725 1 0.859 0.38 (drs) 0.45 1.17 0.53
Bolonco 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.00 1.41 1.41
Chajmaic 0.978 1 1.000 0.53 (drs) 0.54 1.54 0.83
Tuila 0.880 1 0.675 0.52 (drs) 0.40 1.49 0.59
Nueva Palestina 0.511 1 0.574 1 1.12 1.76 1.97
Cahaboncito 1.000 1 0.995 0.51 (drs) 0.51 1.05 0.54
Rancho 1.000 1 1.000 0.69 (drs) 0.69 1.11 0.77
Santa Elena 0.495 1 0.465 0.61 (drs) 0.57 1.02 0.58
Campat 0.802 1 0.900 1 1.12 1.55 1.73
Chajaneb 1.000 1 0.661 1 0.66 1.88 1.24
Chamil 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.00 2.06 2.06
Chamisun 0.026 0.51 (drs) 0.213 0.50 (drs) 8.05 1.73 13.91
Saquil 0.666 1 0.369 1 0.55 2.08 1.16
Caquigual 1.000 0.58 (drs) 0.776 0.36 (drs) 0.33 2.07 0.68
Chacalte SJC 0.823 1 0.802 1 0.98 1.34 1.30
Pocola 0.381 0.50 (drs) 0.456 0.51 (drs) 1.22 1.61 1.95
Semesche 0.812 1 0.583 0.51 (drs) 0.37 1.61 0.60
Chijou 0.879 1 0.635 0.50 (drs) 0.36 1.49 0.54
Najquitob 0.586 1 0.827 0.62 (drs) 0.87 1.21 1.05
Actela 0.638 1 0.976 1 1.53 1.42 2.18
Camelias 0.464 1 0.670 1 1.44 1.36 1.96
Pasmolon 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.00 1.48 1.48
Chiacal 0.702 1 0.757 1 1.08 1.36 1.46
Chacalte T 0.594 1 0.476 0.51 (drs) 0.41 1.59 0.64
Cucanja 0.978 1 0.693 1 0.71 1.72 1.22
Raxquix 0.992 1 1.000 0.53 (drs) 0.53 1.90 1.01
Average score: 0.778 0.750 0.71 1.46 1.04

VRS=variable return to scales, drs=diminishing return to scales, TFP=total factor productivity.