Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;6(8):1222–1235. doi: 10.1111/eva.12099

Table 3.

Resistance to Cry1Ac and cross-resistance to Cry2Ab in Cry1Ac-selected strains of H. armigera.

Country (region*) Location Year Strain RR Dominance (h) § Cry2Ab CRR‡‡ References
Cry1Ac (DC) Cry1Ac (LC50**) Bt cotton††
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY9 88 0.00 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY16 0.00 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY27 0.00 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY148 0.00 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY440 47 0.04 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY335 89 0.13 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY-r15 82 0.33 0.63 Zhang et al. (2012b)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY423 660 0.64 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2009 AY441 95 0.66 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (N) Anyang 2011 AY2 1200 1.0 0.85 0.94 5.9 This paper
China (N) Gaoyang§§ 2001 SCD-r1 440 0.00 1.2¶¶ Yang et al. (2009)
China (N) Gaoyang§§ 2001 SCD-r1 540 0.00 0.04 Zhang et al. (2012b)
China (N) Gaoyang 2001 GYBT 560 0.24 1.4§§ Xu et al. (2005)
China (N) Langfang 2000 LFR10 250*** 1.0*** Luo et al. (2007)
China (N) Qiuxian 2011 QX7 460 1.0 0.83 0.97 4.2 This paper
China (N) Xiajin 2009 XJ-r15 140 0.65 0.68 1.4 Zhang et al. (2012b)
China (N) Xinxiang 1996 BtR 3000*** 0.28 1.1*** Luo et al. (2007), Liang et al. (2008)
China (NW) Shache 2010 SC23 39 0.00 Zhang et al. (2012a)
China (NW) Shawan 2010 SW34 31 0.26 Zhang et al. (2012a)
Australia Mixed††† BX 260 0.39 0.00, 0.63‡‡‡ 1.4 Akhurst et al. (2003), Bird and Akhurst (2004, 2005)
India Akola Cry1Ac- resistant 72 1.1 Rajagopal et al. (2009)
India Gujarat 2002 Res-Bt 93 0.42 0.43 Kranthi et al. (2006)
India Gujarat 2006 BH-R 230 0.85§§§ Nair et al. (2010)
India Nagpur 2002 Res-Ac 210 0.56 Kranthi et al. (2006)
India Punjab 2005 BM-R 72 0.00¶¶¶ 0.31 Kaur and Dilawari (2011)
India Tamil Nadu BCR 13 0.37 Shanmugam et al. (2007)
Pakistan Punjab 2010 Cry1Ac- SEL 5400**** 0.59 Alvi et al. (2012)
*

N indicates northern China; NW indicates areas of northwestern China with limited planting of Bt cotton.

The year when insects were sampled from the field to start the strain.

Resistance ratio, LC50 of Cry1Ac for the resistant strain divided by LC50 of Cry1Ac for a susceptible strain.

§

Inheritance was autosomal in all strains except BH-R; when h was reported for each reciprocal cross, the mean is shown.

h calculated from survival at a diagnostic concentration (1 μg Cry1Ac/cm2 diet unless noted otherwise; see Methods).

**

h calculated from LC50 values of Cry1Ac (see Methods).

††

h calculated from survival on Bt cotton leaves unless noted otherwise (see Methods).

‡‡

Cross-resistance ratio; LC50 of Cry2Ab for the resistant strain divided by LC50 of Cry2Ab for a susceptible strain.

§§

The r1 allele from GYBT was introduced by repeated crossing and selection into the susceptible SCD strain.

¶¶

Based on Cry2Aa, which is similar to Cry2Ab.

***

Based on concentration of toxin causing 50% weight loss (WLC50) of the resistant strain divided by WLC50 of a susceptible strain.

†††

Created by pooling three strains, one from Queensland and two apparently from New South Wales.

‡‡‡

0.00 on young, intact plants; 0.63 on older, intact plants with a lower concentration of Cry1Ac.

§§§

0.97 for the cross with resistant females; 0.73 for the reciprocal cross (mean = 0.85).

¶¶¶

Diagnostic concentration of 1 microgram Cry1Ac/mL diet.

****

Relative to the LAB-PK strain that was lab-selected for increased susceptibility.