Table 3.
Country (region*) | Location | Year† | Strain | RR‡ | Dominance (h) § | Cry2Ab CRR‡‡ | References | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cry1Ac (DC¶) | Cry1Ac (LC50**) | Bt cotton†† | ||||||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY9 | 88 | 0.00 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY16 | 0.00 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | |||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY27 | 0.00 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | |||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY148 | 0.00 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | |||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY440 | 47 | 0.04 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY335 | 89 | 0.13 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY-r15 | 82 | 0.33 | 0.63 | Zhang et al. (2012b) | |||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY423 | 660 | 0.64 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2009 | AY441 | 95 | 0.66 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (N) | Anyang | 2011 | AY2 | 1200 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 5.9 | This paper | |||||
China (N) | Gaoyang§§ | 2001 | SCD-r1 | 440 | 0.00 | 1.2¶¶ | Yang et al. (2009) | |||||||
China (N) | Gaoyang§§ | 2001 | SCD-r1 | 540 | 0.00 | 0.04 | Zhang et al. (2012b) | |||||||
China (N) | Gaoyang | 2001 | GYBT | 560 | 0.24 | 1.4§§ | Xu et al. (2005) | |||||||
China (N) | Langfang | 2000 | LFR10 | 250*** | 1.0*** | Luo et al. (2007) | ||||||||
China (N) | Qiuxian | 2011 | QX7 | 460 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 4.2 | This paper | |||||
China (N) | Xiajin | 2009 | XJ-r15 | 140 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.4 | Zhang et al. (2012b) | ||||||
China (N) | Xinxiang | 1996 | BtR | 3000*** | 0.28 | 1.1*** | Luo et al. (2007), ¶ Liang et al. (2008) | |||||||
China (NW) | Shache | 2010 | SC23 | 39 | 0.00 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
China (NW) | Shawan | 2010 | SW34 | 31 | 0.26 | Zhang et al. (2012a) | ||||||||
Australia | Mixed††† | BX | 260 | 0.39 | 0.00, 0.63‡‡‡ | 1.4 | Akhurst et al. (2003), Bird and Akhurst (2004, 2005) | |||||||
India | Akola | Cry1Ac- resistant | 72 | 1.1 | Rajagopal et al. (2009) | |||||||||
India | Gujarat | 2002 | Res-Bt | 93 | 0.42 | 0.43 | Kranthi et al. (2006) | |||||||
India | Gujarat | 2006 | BH-R | 230 | 0.85§§§ | Nair et al. (2010) | ||||||||
India | Nagpur | 2002 | Res-Ac | 210 | 0.56 | Kranthi et al. (2006) | ||||||||
India | Punjab | 2005 | BM-R | 72 | 0.00¶¶¶ | 0.31 | Kaur and Dilawari (2011) | |||||||
India | Tamil Nadu | BCR | 13 | 0.37 | Shanmugam et al. (2007) | |||||||||
Pakistan | Punjab | 2010 | Cry1Ac- SEL | 5400**** | 0.59 | Alvi et al. (2012) |
N indicates northern China; NW indicates areas of northwestern China with limited planting of Bt cotton.
The year when insects were sampled from the field to start the strain.
Resistance ratio, LC50 of Cry1Ac for the resistant strain divided by LC50 of Cry1Ac for a susceptible strain.
Inheritance was autosomal in all strains except BH-R; when h was reported for each reciprocal cross, the mean is shown.
h calculated from survival at a diagnostic concentration (1 μg Cry1Ac/cm2 diet unless noted otherwise; see Methods).
h calculated from LC50 values of Cry1Ac (see Methods).
h calculated from survival on Bt cotton leaves unless noted otherwise (see Methods).
Cross-resistance ratio; LC50 of Cry2Ab for the resistant strain divided by LC50 of Cry2Ab for a susceptible strain.
The r1 allele from GYBT was introduced by repeated crossing and selection into the susceptible SCD strain.
Based on Cry2Aa, which is similar to Cry2Ab.
Based on concentration of toxin causing 50% weight loss (WLC50) of the resistant strain divided by WLC50 of a susceptible strain.
Created by pooling three strains, one from Queensland and two apparently from New South Wales.
0.00 on young, intact plants; 0.63 on older, intact plants with a lower concentration of Cry1Ac.
0.97 for the cross with resistant females; 0.73 for the reciprocal cross (mean h = 0.85).
Diagnostic concentration of 1 microgram Cry1Ac/mL diet.
Relative to the LAB-PK strain that was lab-selected for increased susceptibility.