Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e85253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085253

Table 2. Summary table of the results of the DISTLM analysis, results shown are for the model with the lowest AICc values for each response variable.

Response AICc % total variability explained Predictors % variability explained by each predictor Pseudo-F P-value Relationship
Total sponge abundance 333.08 13 Hard coral cover 8 0.47 0.57 positive
Sediment 4 2.67 0.092 positive
Chlorophyll-a 1 0.96 0.34 positive
Sponge abundance excluding 340.71 34 Sediment 18 12.1 0.0004 negative
L. herbacea Quadrat Angle 12 7.64 0.0029 positive
Hard coral cover 1 6.58 0.0064 positive
Chlorophyll-a 4 2.38 0.12 unclear
Abundance of L. herbacea 390.85 15 Sediment 15 9.2 0.0001 positive
Multivariate sponge assemblage 426.74 26 Sediment 8 5.06 0.0001 NA
Chlorophyll-a 6 3.64 0.0001 NA
Spongivorous fish 6 3.45 0.0001 NA
Flow 5 2.84 0.0001 NA
Temperature 4 2.2014 0.001 NA