Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Mar;38(2):289–295. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100011483

Table 3.

Assessment of axonal loss by summated motor and sensory nerve conduction amplitudes in WM, IGM-MGUS, and healthy subjects

WM (N=30) IgM-MGUS (N=73) Healthy subjects WM vs healthy subjects IgM-MGUS vs healthy subjects IgM-MGUS vs WM
CMAPs* Percentiles of mean (range) 8.08 (0.06 – 40.79) 6.34 (0.03 – 85.15) 50.92 (3.22 – 96.86) P<0.001 P<0.001 p=0.419
SNAPs* Percentiles of mean (range) 0.09 (0.03 –17.23) 0.20 (0.03 – 53.59) 49.48 (0.70 – 98.66) P<0.001 P<0.001 p=0.376
*

The mean of mean values of summed ulnar, peroneal, and tibial compound motor action potential (CMAPs) (mV) or median and sural sensory sensory nerve action potential (SNAPs)’ corrected for age, gender, height and weight as compared to reference values of healthy subjects (29–31).