Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 14;15:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-26

Table 2.

Phenotypic characterization of strains used in this study

Strain Species Relative growth, at day 21 (6°C) 1 Relative proteolysis on Skim Milk Agar (24 h 32°C) β-gal activity Antimicrobial resistance pattern 3
FSL R5-860
Bacillus sp.
-
+
-
Lincomycin, Penicillin
FSL H7-687
Bacillus weihenstephanensis
++
+
-
Lincomycin, Penicillin
FSL R5-213
Viridibacillus arenosi
++
- 2
-
Lincomycin
FSL H8-237
Paenibacillus odorifer
++
+
+
Not tested4
FSL R7-277
Paenibacillus sp.
+
+
+
Streptomycin
FSL R7-269
Paenibacillus sp.
+
+
+
Streptomycin
FSL R5-192
Paenibacillus amylolyticus
-
+
+
Lincomycin, Streptomycin
FSL H7-689
Paenibacillus amylolyticus
++
+
+
Pansusceptible
FSL R5-808
Paenibacillus glucanolyticus
-
-
+
Lincomycin, Penicillin
FSL H8-457 Paenibacillus lautus - - + Lincomycin, Penicillin

1Relative growth in skim milk broth, plated on BHI at day 21 of shelf life (storaged at 6°C): (−) <1 log cfu/mL, (+) 1–6 log cfu/mL, (++) >6 log cfu/mL.

2Isolate produced pinkish coloration of Skim Milk Agar.

3Isolates were tested for susceptibility against 16 antimicrobials included in the Gram positive NARMS panel (see Methods).

4Strain was considered too fastidious for susceptible testing.