Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013 Nov 22;107:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.005

Table 2.

Mean change (in εv) in a 500–700 ms window over posterior sensors for correctly recognized emotionally arousing and low arousal words that were encoded under threat of shock or safety, and recognized under threat of shock or safety, and new words tested under threat of shock or safety.(standard error of the mean).

Recognition Context

Old words New words
Threat during encoding Safe during encoding
Threat
  Emotionally arousing words 2.46 (.49) 1.65 (.62) 1.02 (.62)
  Low arousal words 1.75 (.44) 1.65 (.35) 1.33 (.38)
Safe
  Emotionally arousing words 2.65 (.51) 1.33 (.55) 1.10 (.39)
  Low arousal words 1.65 (.37) 1.42 (.37) 1.30 (.31)