Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 17;4(1):e004073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004073

Table 2.

‘Goodness of fit’ statistics for the 10-state† disability (EDSS) Markov models

Description of each 10-state† disability model −2 Log likelihood‡ Prediction errors (years 1–10)§
×1000 Cells EDSS Utility
No covariates 17.152 2.20 0.24 0.022
One covariate models
 Age at onset, binary 17.458 1.39 0.09 0.009
 Age at onset, continuous 17.599 1.58 0.13 0.007
 MSSS at baseline, binary 17.460 1.41 0.10 0.008
 MSSS at baseline, continuous 17.457
 Disease duration, binary 17.462 1.33 0.10 0.009
 Disease duration, continuous 17.557
 Sex 17.470 1.32 0.10 0.008
Two covariates models
 Sex and age at onset, binary 17.603 1.51 0.14 0.007
 Sex and age at onset, continuous 17.618
 Age at onset and MSSS, binary 17.609 1.53 0.14 0.007
 Age at onset and MSSS, continuous 17.618
 Age at onset and disease duration, binary 17.603 1.52 0.14 0.007
 Age at onset and disease duration, continuous 17.618

Primary goodness of fit statistic is −2 log likelihood; prediction errors have only been calculated for the binary versions of the individual models except for the ‘final’ model with age at onset as covariate where prediction errors have been calculated for both versions.

†The 10 disability states refer to EDSS 0–9, that is, EDSS 0 is ‘state 1’, EDSS 1 is ‘state 2’, etc.

‡Log likelihood statistic as calculated by ‘msm’ module, see Jackson19 for details; lower values implying a better model (to be compared within each class of models, eg, one-covariate and two-covariate models).

§Prediction errors, averaged over years 1–10, for (a) the EDSS distribution in individual cells, (b) average EDSS, (c) average utility (see definitions in the online supplementary appendix 3, comparing the values predicted by the model with the ‘observed’ values using the method of midpoint interpolation (see online supplementary appendix 2).

EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Score; MSSS, Multiple Sclerosis Status Score.