. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2013 May 6;25(3):966–978. doi: 10.1037/a0032880

Table 1. Test of Informant Differences on Clustering Variables and Cluster Differences on Rates of Abuse.

	Primary	Secondary	Anxious- Conduct	Test Statistic	Effect Size
CU Traits
Youth APSD	(n = 84) 4.56 (2.00)^a	(n = 89) 5.28 (2.05)^b	(n = 92) 3.74 (1.76)^c	F (2, 262) = 14.24^***	η_p² =.098
Parent APSD	(n = 84) 6.19 (2.34)^a	(n = 89) 6.33 (2.30)^a	(n = 94) 4.43 (1.62)^b	F (2, 264) = 23.25^***	η_p² =.150
Anxious Depressed
Youth YSR	(n = 85) 51.61 (2.80)^a	(n = 91) 60.47 (10.25)^b	(n = 96) 59.68 (7.54)^b	F (2, 269) = 36.48^***	η_p² =.213
Parent CBCL	(n = 83) 60.39 (9.04)^a	(n = 89) 64.48 (9.71)^b	(n = 94) 62.67 (9.90)ab	F (2, 263) = 3.83^*	η_p² =.028
Abuse	(n = 85)	(n = 91)	(n = 96)
Physical	14 (17%)^a	27 (31%)^b	15 (16%)^a	χ² (2) = 7.35^*	φ =.17
Sexual	15 (18%)^a	30 (36%)^b	15 (16%)^a	χ² (2) = 11.41^**	φ =.21
Neglect	14 (17%)	19 (23%)	17 (18%)	χ² (2) = 1.01	φ =.06

Note.

^***

= p < .001

^**

= p < .01

= p < .05, two tailed. Rates with different superscripts differ significantly in pairwise comparisons. APSD = Antisocial Process Screening Device; CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist; YSR = Youth Self Report.