. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Hand Ther. 2013 Sep 29;27(1):4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.08.021

Table 3.

Upper extremity range of motion multiple comparisons

Movement	Side	Post hoc comparison	Difference between groups Degrees ROM Mean/SE	95% Confidence Interval	Significance (p) (ANOVA)
Shoulder abduction	Affected				Overall: 0.003
		+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / − lymphedema	21.59 (6.22)	38.23, 4.95	0.004
		− pain / − lymphedema vs − pain / + lymphedema	16.18 (5.76)	31.58, 0.77	0.034

	Difference between sides				Overall: 0.020
	Difference between sides	+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / − lymphedema	14.58 (5.25)	0.53, 28.63	0.037

Elbow extension	Unaffected				Overall: 0.021
	Unaffected	+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / − lymphedema	2.83 (0.97)	5.43, 0.22	0.026

	Difference between sides				Overall: 0.043
	Difference between sides	None			NA

ULNT elbow extension	Unaffected				Overall: 0.013
		+ pain / + lymphedema vs + pain / − lymphedema	9.38 (3.23)	18.02, 0.83	0.026
		+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / + lymphedema	7.67 (2.77)	15.09, 0.225	0.039
	Affected				Overall: 0.001
		+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / − lymphedema	11.38 (2.90)	3.61, 19.15	0.001
		+ pain / + lymphedema vs − pain / + lymphedema	10.11 (2.99)	18.12, 2.11	0.006