Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Sin. 2013 Jan 1;23(1):231–250. doi: 10.5705/ss.2011.081

Table 7.2.

Simulation results comparing our approach with Shih’s approach in the sibling study with a binary outcome and a binary exposure. Sample sizes are for achieving a nominal power 90% to detect different relative risks (p1/p0) at 0.05 significance level for different correlations ρ. The reference risk p0 is fixed at 0.1 and ψ0 = 0. Empirical powers are based on the Wald test.

Our approach
Shih’s approach
“Actual”
RR ρ m Power (%) m Power (%) m Power (%)
2.0 0.10 238 90.34 251 91.72 236 90.02
0.15 225 90.31 238 91.85 220 90.03
0.20 213 90.93 225 91.95 209 89.96
2.5 0.10 118 90.16 130 92.91 118 90.16
0.15 112 90.69 124 93.18 109 90.08
0.20 106 90.70 117 93.37 102 89.96
3.0 0.10 72 90.05 84 93.67 72 90.05
0.15 68 89.75 79 93.90 68 89.75
0.20 65 90.36 75 93.88 64 90.00