Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Sin. 2013 Jan 1;23(1):231–250. doi: 10.5705/ss.2011.081

Table 7.3.

Simulation results comparing our approach with LL’s approach in the sibling study with a binary outcome and a binary exposure. Sample sizes are for achieving a nominal power 90% to detect different effect sizes relative risks (p1/p0) at 0.05 significance level for different correlations ρ. Risk p0 is fixed at 0.1 and ψ0 = 0.5. Empirical powers are based on the quasi-score test.

Our approach
LL’s approach
“Actual”
RR ρ m Power (%) m Power(%) m Power (%)
2.5 0.10 395 90.04 388 89.47 395 90.04
0.15 373 89.83 366 89.59 374 90.10
0.20 351 89.82 345 89.11 351 89.82
3.0 0.10 180 90.16 176 89.53 179 89.99
0.15 170 90.22 166 89.48 169 90.06
0.20 160 90.55 157 89.81 158 89.95
3.5 0.10 104 89.58 102 89.57 105 89.87
0.15 99 90.11 96 88.80 99 90.11
0.20 93 90.19 91 89.70 92 89.88
4.0 0.10 68 89.12 66 88.11 70 89.89
0.15 65 90.12 63 89.23 65 90.12
0.20 61 90.37 59 89.50 61 90.37