Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1703–1710. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000190

Table 2.

Parent-reported characteristics of 109 children with unilateral hearing loss.

Total (n = 109)
Age at identification, mean (SD) years 4.6 (2.6)
How was UHL identified?
   Newborn screening, n (%) 9 (8.3%)
   School screening, n (%) 39 (35.8%)
   PCP screening, n (%) 10 (9.2%)
   Parental suspicion, n (%) 18 (16.5%)
   Audiogram for ear infections, n (%) 11 (10.1%)
   Other, n (%) 25 (22.9%)
Parent or teacher suspected hearing loss, n (%) 53 (48.6%)
Hearing loss has progressed, n (%) 17 (15.6%)
Preferential seating in class, n (%) 78 (71.6%)
Trial of amplification, ever
   FM system, n (%) 30 (27.5%)
   Hearing aid, n (%) 18 (16.5%)
   CROS aid, n (%) 4 (3.67%)
   Bone anchored hearing aid, n (%) 4 (3.67%)
Amplification used currently
   FM system, n (%) 21 (19.3%)
   Hearing aid, n (%) 14 (12.8%)
   CROS aid, n (%) 3 (2.8%)
   Bone anchored hearing aid, n (%) 3 (2.8%)
Overall impact of UHL on child
   None, n (%) 3 (2.8%)
   Very little, n (%) 31 (28.4%)
   Little, n (%) 24 (22.0%)
   Some, n (%) 31 (28.4%)
   A lot, n (%) 16 (14.7%)
   Huge , n (%) 3 (2.8%)
Side of hearing loss
   Right 59 (54.6%)
   Left 49 (45.4%)
Severity of hearing loss
   Mild 5 (4.6%)
   Moderate 22 (20.4%)
   Severe 19 (17.6%)
   Profound 62 (57.4%)
Etiology of hearing loss
   Congenital, n (%) 36 (33.0%)
   Trauma, n (%) 7 (6.4%)
   Meningitis, n (%) 3 (2.8%)
   Unknown, n (%) 51 (46.8%)