Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar 18;32(5):e51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh048

Table 5. Evaluation of gene expression data by qRT–PCR.

  Gene o maska HS maskb LS maskc qRT–PCRd
    Ratio Probes Ratio Probes Ratio Probes  
CFT073 accC –1.3 15 –2.0 5 –1.8 8 –2.1
  dnaJ 2.0 15 1.4 6 1.4 9 1.0
  hisB –1.4 15 –2.2 6 –2.2 6 –2.4
  lgt 2.7 14 1.3 6 1.6 8 1.3
  lldP 5.3 15 1.3 5 2.0 7 –1.1
  oppB 3.2 15 1.0 5 1.2 6 –1.2
  pssR 2.5 11 1.0 5 1.3 6 1.1
  slpA 2.6 15 1.5 6 1.6 7 1.3
  sucD –1.4 15 –2.1 8 –1.9 11 –1.5
O157:H7 EDL933 cutF 2.6 15 1.1 5 1.2 6 1.3
  eco 2.1 15 1.2 8 1.2 9 –1.2
  lspA 3.2 15 1.5 8 1.6 10 1.8
  mopA –1.5 15 –3.0 8 –3.1 11 –3.6
  rplW –1.3 14 –2.0 5 –1.3 13 –1.8
  sodA 2.6 15 1.3 4 1.3 7 1.2
  thiL –1.5 14 –2.2 7 –1.9 8 –5.0
  pspE 2.0 15 –1.1 8 1.4 11 –2.1
  yaeC 2.6 15 1.4 7 1.1 8 –3.1
  yfiD 1.1 14 –3.9 7 –4.0 7 –1.3

aRatio of gene expression level of K12 MG1655 and the indicated strain before masking and number of probe pairs used for this calculation.

bRatio of gene expression level of K12 MG1655 and the indicated strain after application of the high stringency electronic mask and the number of probe pairs used for this calculation.

cRatio of gene expression level of K12 MG1655 and the indicated strain after application of the low stringency electronic mask and the number of probe pairs used for this calculation.

dRatio of gene expression level of K12 MG1655 and the indicated strain as determined by quantitative RT–PCR.