Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087508

Table 2. Selected QC metrics for PAX and TEM arrays.

SAMPLE SF RawQ BG Avg %P Signal(All) Actin Signal Actin 3-5-ratio
P13.mas5 23.86 0.832 29.48 33.74 910.39 41134.71 2.37
P16.mas5 20.97 0.805 30.11 33.61 908.23 35056.00 2.30
PG10.mas5 16.53 0.779 29.05 37.72 917.59 46817.15 2.25
PG11.mas5 26.34 0.784 29.39 32.91 975.39 58756.44 3.95
PG12.mas5 28.01 0.800 30.19 30.45 949.32 38274.88 3.03
PG14.mas5 20.69 0.773 29.40 34.20 937.87 49253.10 2.31
PG15.mas5 15.86 0.877 31.80 36.87 873.14 38324.91 2.23
PG17.mas5 13.24 0.792 29.55 39.35 848.18 33711.05 2.80
PG3_1.mas5 41.31 0.706 27.23 29.97 997.94 49350.14 31.60
PG4_1.mas5 51.73 0.744 28.46 26.93 1016.88 31745.37 48.67
PG5.mas5 17.60 0.769 28.84 36.57 959.76 45626.00 2.13
PG6.mas5 21.69 0.840 30.15 31.64 927.78 42699.89 3.18
PG7.mas5 12.57 0.930 32.50 38.57 867.41 33979.42 2.09
PG8.mas5 17.66 0.851 30.08 35.65 906.00 35655.77 2.38
PG9.mas5 16.20 0.839 31.17 37.20 886.68 24967.63 1.73
AV. PAX 22.95 0.808 29.83 34.36 925.51 40356.83 7.53
T10.mas5 6.83 0.896 32.21 43.27 841.55 25843.87 1.67
T11.mas5 9.42 0.883 32.82 41.37 882.21 29647.80 1.42
T12.mas5 14.88 1.009 33.58 35.12 942.61 33275.39 1.37
T13.mas5 8.67 1.037 35.47 40.05 893.06 29685.47 1.38
T15.mas5 13.33 0.873 30.23 37.99 897.58 26182.47 1.60
T16.mas5 10.01 0.987 32.56 39.78 933.23 28284.56 1.25
T17.mas5 9.47 0.864 31.85 41.78 877.22 28296.21 1.23
T3_1.mas5 9.61 0.990 32.90 42.47 893.88 32139.52 1.46
T4.mas5 10.17 0.959 33.49 41.51 886.43 28244.28 1.44
T5.mas5 11.12 0.953 32.65 40.48 872.70 24144.52 1.66
T6.mas5 10.41 1.127 37.35 37.16 884.89 33334.57 1.30
T7.mas5 8.29 1.138 38.70 40.82 909.65 38670.56 1.40
T8.mas5 8.37 1.144 37.47 37.94 914.99 40451.85 1.26
T9.mas5 12.92 0.887 31.10 38.73 893.45 28633.24 1.56
AV. TEM 10.25 0.982 33.74 39.89 894.53 30488.16 1.43

Scale factor (SF), rawQ, background (BG), percentage present (%P), total signal, actin signal, as well as actin 3′ to 5′ ratio are all listed for PAX and TEM arrays used in this study. Three arrays in total did not pass quality control and were not analysed: one array was extracted by the LL method, one array by TEM GC and one from TEM.