Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb;133(2):e276–e282. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1157

TABLE 2.

Comparisons Among Sexting Groups on Sexual Behaviors, Cognitions, and Emotional Competence Variables

Unadjusted Parameter Estimates Adjusted Effect Size
None (n = 318), % Text only (n = 71), % Photo (n = 21), % Sexting Versus None Photo Versus Text
Sexual risk behaviors OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
 Romantic partner 80 99 100
 Made out 32 87 86 5.97 (3.59–9.94) <.01 1.10 (0.53–2.25) .81
 Touched genitals over clothes 16 63 81 7.34 (4.54–11.89) <.01 1.98 (1.06–3.70) .03
 Friends with benefits 16 53 76 4.86 (3.14–7.55) <.01 1.77 (0.99–3.19) .06
 Touched genitals under clothes 7 36 62 5.38 (3.41–8.49) <.01 1.85 (1.08–3.17) .02
 Oral sex 8 29 57 5.40 (3.32–8.80) <.01 2.66 (1.49–4.73) <.01
 Vaginal sex 5 22 48 5.01 (2.99–8.40) <.01 2.23 (1.26–3.95) <.01
 Same sex: made out 2 7 33 4.45 (2.19–9.06) <.01 2.18 (1.07–4.43) .03
 Same sex: touched genitals 2 10 29 4.63 (2.37–9.05) <.01 1.71 (0.87–3.37) .12
Risk-Related Cognitions Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Cohen’s δa P Cohen’s δa P
 Sexual intentions 1.88 (1.18) 2.86 (1.24) 3.05 (1.63) 0.69 (0.48–0.89) <.01 0.17 (0.00–0.36) .06
 Perceived peer approval 2.35 (0.80) 3.05 (0.77) 2.65 (0.68) 0.46 (0.26–0.66) <.01 0.06 (0.00–0.25) .50
 Perceived media approval 2.02 (0.95) 2.63 (1.05) 2.50 (1.00) 0.40 (0.20–0.59) <.01 0.00 (0.00–0.06) .97
 Perceived parental approval 1.54 (0.55) 1.84 (0.67) 1.85 (0.60) 0.43 (0.23–0.62) <.01 0.14 (0.00–0.33) .11
Emotional competence
 DER awareness 2.99 (1.08) 3.12 (1.17) 3.62 (0.98) 0.28 (0.08–0.47) <.01 0.22 (0.00–0.42) .06
 DER regulation 2.07 (0.83) 2.11 (0.75) 2.52 (1.00) 0.19 (0.00–0.39) .07 0.19 (0.00–0.39) .07
 Emotional self-efficacy 2.99 (0.85) 2.76 (0.87) 2.18 (0.72) 0.42 (0.22–0.61) <.01 0.22 (0.00–0.41) .07

CI, confidence interval; DER, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale.

a

Effect sizes were computed by using partial η2 and converted to Cohen’s δ using standard conversion formulas.25