Table 3.
Comparison of four designs for scenario 3 (bold-faced numbers correspond to the true MTD)
Dose | True toxicity probability | Design |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
Recommended dose level (%) | ||||||
0 | - | 38 | - | - | - | - |
1 | 0.22 | 37 | 52 | 61 | 54 | 61 |
2 | 0.32 | 20 | 35 | 26 | 30 | 28 |
3 | 0.45 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 11 |
4 | 0.54 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
5 | 0.69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 0.80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose level treated at (%) | ||||||
1 | 0.22 | 63 | 17 | 68 | 51 | 55 |
2 | 0.32 | 27 | 13 | 23 | 23 | 26 |
3 | 0.45 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 15 | 14 |
4 | 0.54 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
5 | 0.69 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
6 | 0.80 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Median DLT rate (min, max) | 33 (13, 100) | 54 (17, 95) | 30 (8, 60) | 33 (9, 90) | 30 (13, 90) | |
Median trial length, months (min, max) | 25 (5, 63) | 13 (18, 20) | 18 (13, 44) | 29 (16, 52) | 101 (61, 156) | |
Median number of patients (min, max) | 12 (3, 27) | 24 (11, 24) | 10 (10, 24) | 14 (10, 24) | 16 (10, 24) |