Table 5.

Logistic regression of illicit drug use on racist life events, socio-demographics, and culture and ethnicity variables

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Racist life events (RLE)	1.00 (0.01)	1.04 (0.02)	1.05 (0.03)	1.02 (0.02)
Socio-demographics
Age (ten years)	1.25 (0.17)	1.30 (0.18)	1.26 (0.17)	1.31 (0.18)
Education (years)	0.92 (0.09)	0.85 (0.08)	0.90 (0.09)	0.89 (0.08)
Household income ($K)	0.98 (0.01)	0.98 (0.01)	0.98 (0.01)	0.98 (0.01)
Work status1
Full-time	0.28 (0.16)*	0.31 (0.17)*	0.27 (0.15)*	0.28 (0.16)*
Part-time	0.76 (0.35)	0.80 (0.37)	0.77 (0.36)	0.82 (0.37)
Culture and ethnicity
Ethnic affirmation	1.20 (0.65)
Ethnic identity achievement	0.73 (0.43)
Ethnic community member	0.50 (0.21)
Strong cultural practices2	0.85 (0.39)			2.21 (1.32)
Interaction terms
Categorical ethnic affirm3
Medium		2.20 (1.61)
High		1.38 (1.00)
Ethnic affirmation * RLE
Medium * RLE		0.92 (0.04)*
High * RLE		0.96 (0.03)
Categorical ethnic identity2
Medium			1.97 (1.34)
High			1.82 (1.48)
Ethnic identity * RLE
Medium * RLE			0.95 (0.03)
High * RLE			0.91 (0.04)*
Cultural practices * RLE				0.93 (0.03)*
Pseudo R2	0.12	0.12	0.14	0.12
BIC	241.18	240.93	237.81	229.70
LR X2	24.77**	25.02**	28.13**	25.62**

¹Omitted category is “unemployed”

²Omitted category is “low to moderate engagement in cultural practices”

³Distribution divided into thirds; Omitted category is “low”

^*= p <.05;

^**= p <.01;

^***= p <.001 (two-tailed tests)

Note: Odds ratios are presented, standard errors in parentheses