Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Mar;11(3):512–520. doi: 10.1111/jth.12130

Table 1.

Characteristics and phenotypic data for the 100 study subjects.

Type 3 VWD (n=42) OC (n=21) Type 1 VWD (n=30) UFM (n=7) p
No. of Females (%) 23 (55) 11 (52) 17 (57) 4 (57) ns
Mean age, years (range) 29 (1–72) 51 (32–83) 39 (2–85) 49 (22–68) 0.001
No. Blood group O (%) 16 (39) 6 (29) 10 (33) 0 (0) ns
Mean VWF:Ag, IU/ml (range) 0.02 (0.01–0.07) 0.74 (0.24–1.42) 0.35 (0.11–0.52) 1.40 (0.95–2.04) <0.001
Mean VWF:RCo, IU/ml (range) 0.02 (0.00–0.05) 0.66 (0.15–1.15) 0.30 (0.05–0.57) 1.04 (0.66–1.96) <0.001
Mean FVIII:C, IU/ml (range) 0.03 (0.00–0.09) 0.88 (0.37–1.56) 0.53 (0.02–1.32) 1.23 (0.52–2.12) <0.001
Median bleeding score (range) 13 (3–30) 1 (−1 to 6) 4 (0–12) 0 (−1–4) <0.001

OC = obligate carrier; UFM = unaffected family member; ns = no significance. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc testing for all linear variables. For age: post-hoc analysis p=0.001 between type 3 and OC, all other groups =ns. For bleeding score: Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann-Whitney U post hoc testing Post-hoc testing BS: p<0.001 between UFM and T1, T1 and OC, and between T3 and all other groups. Chi-squared testing for categorical variables.