Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Learn Dev. 2013 Oct 11;10(1):51–67. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2013.802962

Table 2. Correlation Matrix Relating Demographic and Speech Acoustic Variables.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Mean F0 --
2. Mean ΔF0 .27** --
3. Mean F0SD .32** .57** --
4. Infant age -.20** -.12* .07 --
5. Gender .05 .07 .02 .01 --
6. Mother's age -.12* .04 -.04 -.03 .03 --
7. Education .01 .11 .18** -.03 .01 .32** --
8. # Children -.05 -.16** -.06 .10 .01 .18** -.18** --
9. Minority -.03 -.11 -.08 .14* .01 -.27** -.28** .06 --
10. BDI score -.05 -.17** -.05 -.01 -.03 -.13* -.32** .15* .06 --

“minority” was contrast coded, where 1 = ethnic minority, -1 = white, non-Hispanic.

*

signifies p = .05;

**

signifies p = .01. Mean F0 refers to the average pitch across all 3 distinct “gorilla” utterances; mean ΔF0 refers to the average pitch range, a gross measure of change in pitch; mean F0 SD refers to the standard deviation of the pitch in “gorilla” utterances, a measure of the dispersion of F0 in relation to the mean.