Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 9;65(2):621–639. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert412

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

GUS staining patterns in AIF:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) GUS activity was specifically detected in the anthers of AIF:GUS floral buds (stages 7–11) and was absent in the young floral buds (yfb) before stages 5–6. The number indicates the stage of flower development. (B) Close-up of young floral buds at stages 3–9. GUS activity started to be detected in anthers (arrowed) of floral buds at stage 7 and was strongly expressed at stages 8–9. GUS was absent in the young floral buds before stages 5–6. (C) The corresponding young floral buds at stages 3–6 in (B) are indicated by dashed circles. (D) Close-up of a floral bud at stage 8. Strong GUS activity was detected only in anthers (an) and in the upper parts of filaments (arrowed). (E and F) Close-up of a floral bud (E) and anther (F) at stage 10. Strong GUS activity was detected in anthers (an) and pollen (arrowed). (G) GUS staining was weak in anthers (an) and pollen of an AIF:GUS mature flower at stage 12. c, carpel; s, sepal; p, petal; f, filament.