Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 19;54(1):218–229. doi: 10.1021/ci400289j

Table 9. Summary of Models Obtained Using Different Scoring Functions.

  ligand protonation scoring function intersection point sensitivity specificity accuracy G-mean MCC
CS docking run neutral Chemscore 28 0.76 0.73 0.75 0.75 0.48
Goldscore 25 0.36 0.66 0.46 0.49 0.02
ASP 25 0.76 0.62 0.71 0.68 0.36
ChemPLP 50 0.66 0.69 0.67 0.68 0.34
XScore 6 0.63 0.78 0.68 0.70 0.38
charged Chemscore 30 0.68 0.79 0.71 0.73 0.44
Goldscore 18 0.50 0.42 0.47 0.46 –0.08
ASP 29 0.60 0.79 0.67 0.69 0.38
ChemPLP 50 0.70 0.68 0.70 0.69 0.37
XScore 6 0.68 0.73 0.70 0.71 0.39
GS docking run neutral Chemscore 22 0.73 0.58 0.68 0.65 0.31
Goldscore 45 0.61 0.75 0.66 0.67 0.34
ASP 25 0.72 0.56 0.67 0.64 0.28
ChemPLP 50 0.65 0.66 0.65 0.65 0.29
XScore 6 0.65 0.73 0.68 0.69 0.36
charged Chemscore 25 0.59 0.75 0.64 0.66 0.32
Goldscore 45 0.71 0.63 0.68 0.67 0.33
ASP 25 0.74 0.57 0.68 0.65 0.31
ChemPLP 50 0.70 0.65 0.68 0.67 0.33
XScore 6 0.68 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.37
combined score (ChemScore + logP) –0.5 0.81 0.69 0.77 0.75 0.49