Table 9. Summary of Models Obtained Using Different Scoring Functions.
ligand protonation | scoring function | intersection point | sensitivity | specificity | accuracy | G-mean | MCC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS docking run | neutral | Chemscore | 28 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.48 |
Goldscore | 25 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.02 | ||
ASP | 25 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.36 | ||
ChemPLP | 50 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.34 | ||
XScore | 6 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.38 | ||
charged | Chemscore | 30 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.44 | |
Goldscore | 18 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.46 | –0.08 | ||
ASP | 29 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.38 | ||
ChemPLP | 50 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.37 | ||
XScore | 6 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.39 | ||
GS docking run | neutral | Chemscore | 22 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.31 |
Goldscore | 45 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.34 | ||
ASP | 25 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.28 | ||
ChemPLP | 50 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.29 | ||
XScore | 6 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.36 | ||
charged | Chemscore | 25 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.32 | |
Goldscore | 45 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||
ASP | 25 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.31 | ||
ChemPLP | 50 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||
XScore | 6 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.37 | ||
combined score (ChemScore + logP) | –0.5 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.49 |