Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 7;58(23):8573–8591. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8573

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Left-right comparisons for breast density measurements from (a) thresholding and (b) FCM segmentation. The linear fits for each method are also shown with standard errors of 3.39% and 3.35% respectively. Note that both methods have a Pearson’s r > 0.95. Hence both methods are precise in their measurements of breast density.