Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Jan;55(1):59–66. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31826bb686

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in relation to oral cavity arsenical lesions

Variables Normal Gums Arsenical lesions Other p-value Normal Lips Arsenical lesions Other p-value Normal Tongue Arsenical lesions Other p- value
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Age (years) (N=11,454) (N=35) (N=47) 0.002 (N=11,497) (N=17) (N=21) 0.008 (N=11,400) (N=79) (N=57) <0.001
  17–30 3,583(31) 6(17) 5(11) 3,590(31) 3(18) 1(5) 3,565(31) 13(16) 16(28)
  31–40 4,081(36) 15(43) 16(34) 4,099(36) 5(29) 7(33) 4,065(36) 22(28) 25(44)
  41–75 3,790(33) 14(40) 26(55) 3,808(33) 9(53) 13(62) 3,770(33) 44(56) 16(28)
Sex (N=11,454) (N=35) (N=47) 0.004 (N=11,497) (N=17) (N=21) 0.001 (N=11,400) (N=79) (N=57) 0.004
  Male 4,889(43) 21(60) 29(62) 4,911(43) 14(82) 13(62) 4,869(43) 48(61) 22(39)
  Female 6,565(57) 14(40) 18(38) 6,586(57) 3(18) 8(38) 6,531(57) 31(39) 35(61)
Education (years) (N=11,448) (N=35) (N=47) 0.071 (N=11,491) (N=17) (N=21) 0.114 (N=11,394) (N=79) (N=57) 0.316
 No education 5,075(44) 18(51) 28(60) 5,105(44) 6(35) 9(43) 5,050(44) 40(51) 31(54)
  1–4 years 1,666(15) 7(20) 8(17) 1,670(15) 6(35) 5(24) 1,660(15) 12(15) 9(16)
  5–16 years 4,707(41) 10(29) 11(23) 4,716(41) 5(30) 7(33) 4,684(41) 27(34) 17(30)
Own cultivation land (N=11,451) (N=35) (N=47) 0.609 (N=11,494) (N=17) (N=21) 0.937 (N=11,397) (N=79) (N=57) 0.510
  Yes 5,698(50) 17(49) 20(43) 5,714(50) 9(53) 11(52) 5,674(50) 36(46) 25(44)
  No 5,753(50) 18(51) 27(57) 5,780(50) 8(47) 10(48) 5,723(50) 43(54) 32(56)

Two-sided χ2 test; missing values were excluded from the statistical comparison. Fisher’s exact p-values were used where cells less than 5.

Abbreviations: Normal = no symptoms, arsenical lesions = arsenicosis symptoms due to arsenic exposure, other = other pathological conditions except arsenical lesions.

N = number.