. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086298

Table 2. Analysis of variance of lag phase, viability change, and SSU1 expression according to the translocation and total SO₂ concentration in the medium.

	Lag phase (h) ^a		LP Viability ^a		SSU1/ACT1 ^b
	part of variance	p value	part of variance	p value	part of variance	p value
Translocation	36.4	<0.001	36.2	<0.001	28.4	<0,001
SO₂	22.2	<0.001	8.0	<0.05	0.5	ns
Translocation:SO₂	34.9	<0.001	26.4	<0.01	2.3	ns
qPCR block	nd		nd		8.0	<0.05
Residual	6.4		29.4		60.8

the model used was Z1 = μ+translocation _(i,j,k)*SO_2(i,j,k) +ε _i, which allows the estimation of the part of the variance explained by the chromosome XVI forms (n = 3) and the SO₂ concentration (n = 3). For each condition, 3 repetitions were analyzed. nd = not determined.

the model used was Z2 = μ+translocation _(i,j,k)*SO_2(i,j,k)+qPCR_(i,j) +ε _i, which allows the estimation of the part of the variance explained by the chromosome XVI forms (n = 3), the SO₂ concentration (n = 3), and the qPCR blocks. For this model 6 to 9 repetitions were analyzed for each conditions depending on the lag phase time. ns = not significant.

Table 2. Analysis of variance of lag phase, viability change, and SSU1 expression according to the translocation and total SO2 concentration in the medium.

Table 2. Analysis of variance of lag phase, viability change, and SSU1 expression according to the translocation and total SO₂ concentration in the medium.